LYB
Price
$44.91
Change
-$2.76 (-5.79%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
14.45B
19 days until earnings call
MMM
Price
$148.75
Change
-$4.13 (-2.70%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
79.23B
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYB vs MMM

Header iconLYB vs MMM Comparison
Open Charts LYB vs MMMBanner chart's image
LyondellBasell Industries
Price$44.91
Change-$2.76 (-5.79%)
Volume$5.92M
Capitalization14.45B
3M
Price$148.75
Change-$4.13 (-2.70%)
Volume$3.5M
Capitalization79.23B
LYB vs MMM Comparison Chart in %
LYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYB vs. MMM commentary
Oct 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYB is a Hold and MMM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 12, 2025
Stock price -- (LYB: $44.91 vs. MMM: $148.75)
Brand notoriety: LYB: Not notable vs. MMM: Notable
LYB represents the Chemicals: Specialty, while MMM is part of the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYB: 126% vs. MMM: 128%
Market capitalization -- LYB: $14.45B vs. MMM: $79.23B
LYB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $14.45B. MMM’s [@Industrial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $79.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $212.8B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $130.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMMM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LYB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MMM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYB is a better buy in the long-term than MMM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYB is a better buy in the short-term than MMM.

Price Growth

LYB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -9.22% price change this week, while MMM (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -6.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.69%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYB is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

MMM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.84% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Industrial Conglomerates (-1.14% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMM($79.2B) has a higher market cap than LYB($14.4B). LYB has higher P/E ratio than MMM: LYB (95.55) vs MMM (20.66). MMM YTD gains are higher at: 16.904 vs. LYB (-35.433). MMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.02B vs. LYB (2.03B). MMM has more cash in the bank: 4.21B vs. LYB (1.7B). LYB (13.2B) and MMM (13.7B) have identical debt. LYB has higher revenues than MMM: LYB (38.7B) vs MMM (24.6B).
LYBMMMLYB / MMM
Capitalization14.4B79.2B18%
EBITDA2.03B7.02B29%
Gain YTD-35.43316.904-210%
P/E Ratio95.5520.66463%
Revenue38.7B24.6B157%
Total Cash1.7B4.21B40%
Total Debt13.2B13.7B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYB vs MMM: Fundamental Ratings
LYB
MMM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6369
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9014
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYB's Valuation (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (84) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that LYB’s stock grew significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYB (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYB’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's SMR Rating (14) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYB (90) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew significantly faster than LYB’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as LYB (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to LYB’s over the last 12 months.

LYB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that LYB’s stock grew significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYBMMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSLV16.620.19
+1.16%
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
VUSE64.86-1.54
-2.33%
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
QPX42.38-1.03
-2.37%
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
MADE28.41-0.73
-2.51%
iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF
AVGV68.24-1.93
-2.75%
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF

LYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYB has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYB jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYB
1D Price
Change %
LYB100%
-5.79%
DOW - LYB
90%
Closely correlated
-6.48%
WLK - LYB
77%
Closely correlated
-6.29%
DD - LYB
76%
Closely correlated
-5.32%
OLN - LYB
75%
Closely correlated
-10.34%
HUN - LYB
74%
Closely correlated
-6.77%
More

MMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with BBU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then BBU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMM
1D Price
Change %
MMM100%
-2.70%
BBU - MMM
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
VMI - MMM
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
MDU - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
DLX - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
IIIN - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
More