It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
MAR (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -1.13% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.
MAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
MAR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAR | QARP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 2 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 2 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago69% | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 2 days ago59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QARP has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QARP jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QARP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QARP | 100% | -1.70% | ||
MAR - QARP | 74% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
HST - QARP | 72% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
CRH - QARP | 70% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
HAL - QARP | 69% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
COF - QARP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More |