Advertisement
MAR vs WH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Marriott International (MAR) vs. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MAR commands a market capitalization of $94 billion, dwarfing WH's $6 billion, underscoring its scale in the hospitality industry.
- MAR has outperformed YTD with a 14.64% return compared to WH's 7.57%, driven by robust sector recovery.
- WH provides a higher dividend yield of 2.05% versus MAR's 0.75%, attracting income-oriented investors.
- WH's forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 16.86 appears more attractive than MAR's 30.67, hinting at relative value.
- Recent quarterly revenue growth favors MAR at 6.3% over WH's 3.5%, reflecting stronger expansion momentum.
- WH exhibits lower volatility with a beta of 0.71 compared to MAR's 1.11, suiting risk-averse traders.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits MAR (Marriott International), a global leader in upscale and luxury hospitality, against WH (Wyndham Hotels & Resorts), a key player in economy and midscale segments. Both operate asset-light franchise models benefiting from sustained travel demand recovery. Traders seeking growth in premium brands or value in budget lodging, and investors tracking consumer discretionary relative performance, will find insights into market positioning, recent momentum, and sector dynamics valuable in today's evolving hospitality landscape.
MAR Overview and Recent Performance
Marriott International (MAR) manages a vast portfolio of over 8,000 properties worldwide, emphasizing premium brands through franchising and management contracts. In recent market activity, shares have shown resilience, trading around $355 near the 52-week high of $380 amid positive U.S. hotel RevPAR (revenue per available room) data surpassing forecasts. Key influences include portfolio expansions like the W Sardinia debut and anticipation of robust Q1 earnings, with expected EPS (earnings per share) growth of 12.1%. YTD gains of 14.64% reflect optimism in luxury travel rebound, though a higher beta of 1.11 signals volatility tied to economic cycles.
WH Overview and Recent Performance
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) focuses on franchised economy and midscale brands, operating nearly 9,000 properties globally with minimal owned assets. Recent weeks highlighted strong Q1 results, topping EPS estimates at $0.96 versus $0.85 expected and revenue surprises, despite flat U.S. RevPAR. Shares around $81 have climbed YTD by 7.57%, supported by international growth and AI-driven initiatives. A lower beta of 0.71 and attractive dividend yield contribute to stable sentiment, though smaller scale tempers upside relative to peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only 25 elite bots earn a spot based on real-time suitability for current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations. Featured bots boast annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51%-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and drawdowns managed effectively. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents with 63% win rates and small-cap trend traders at +93% returns. These tools offer copy-trading signals for short-term (15min-60min) to longer holds (up to 49 days). Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with hospitality trends or broader opportunities.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MAR and WH both leverage franchise models in hospitality but differ in positioning: MAR targets luxury/upscale with higher RevPAR sensitivity, while WH emphasizes value segments for resilient occupancy. Growth drivers favor MAR's 6.3% quarterly revenue increase and global expansions versus WH's steadier 3.5% pace. Recent momentum tilts to MAR's superior YTD and 12-month returns (+63% vs. +6%), though WH's recent earnings beat bolsters sentiment. Risk profiles contrast with WH's lower beta and better current ratio (0.98 vs. 0.43), but MAR's scale yields higher ROA (9.63%). Market sentiment remains positive for both amid travel recovery, with trade-offs in growth potential versus stability and yield.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI tools, scanning trends and signals, would currently lean toward MAR with higher probability due to consistent upward momentum, stronger revenue growth, and catalysts like elevated RevPAR and earnings outlook. WH offers compelling value via lower forward P/E and dividends, but MAR's relative positioning in premium recovery edges it ahead probabilistically in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAR is a Hold and WH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -2.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +8.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
WH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Cable/Satellite TV (+8.65% weekly)Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.
| MAR | WH | MAR / WH | |
| Capitalization | 92.3B | 6.08B | 1,518% |
| EBITDA | 4.94B | 475M | 1,041% |
| Gain YTD | 13.095 | 8.065 | 162% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.67 | 32.23 | 114% |
| Revenue | 26.6B | 1.44B | 1,847% |
| Total Cash | 454M | 79M | 575% |
| Total Debt | 17.4B | 2.65B | 657% |
MAR | WH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WH's Valuation (78) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (99). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (78). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.
MAR's SMR Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (42). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.
MAR's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (55). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.
WH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (31). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
| MAR | WH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 48% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
MAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.