MAR
Price
$374.43
Change
+$9.96 (+2.73%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
98.73B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WH
Price
$73.53
Change
+$0.05 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.46B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAR vs WH

MAR vs WH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Marriott International (MAR) vs. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale divergence: MAR commands a market capitalization of roughly $94 billion versus approximately $6 billion for WH, reflecting fundamentally different market positioning and investor expectations.
  • Segment exposure matters: Marriott's heavy weighting toward premium, luxury, and full-service brands contrasts sharply with Wyndham's economy and midscale focus, which drives different sensitivities to the macroeconomic cycle.
  • RevPAR (Revenue Per Available Room) trends diverge: Marriott has sustained positive worldwide RevPAR growth in recent quarters, while Wyndham has faced a more challenged top-line environment with global RevPAR declining.
  • Both are asset-light: Each company relies predominantly on franchise and management fees rather than property ownership, generating high-margin, recurring revenue streams with relatively low capital expenditure requirements.
  • Capital return profiles differ: Marriott has deployed billions toward share repurchases and dividends, while Wyndham returns capital on a smaller scale but with a higher dividend yield relative to its share price.
  • Pipeline momentum favors scale: Marriott's development pipeline of nearly 600,000 rooms dwarfs Wyndham's record 257,000-room pipeline, though both indicate healthy developer demand across their respective segments.

Introduction

Marriott International (MAR) and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) represent two distinct approaches to value creation within the global hospitality industry. While both operate asset-light, franchise-heavy business models that generate fee-based income, they cater to markedly different traveler demographics and price points. Marriott's portfolio spans over 30 brands from luxury to select-service, while Wyndham anchors itself firmly in the economy and midscale segments. For investors evaluating exposure to the lodging sector, understanding how these two companies differ in scale, growth trajectory, margin profile, and market sensitivity is essential for informed decision-making. This comparison examines each stock's recent performance, business fundamentals, and relative positioning in the current market environment.

MAR Overview and Recent Performance

Marriott International is the world's largest hotel company by number of rooms, with a global system encompassing approximately 9,700 properties and more than 1.75 million rooms across 30-plus brands. Its portfolio ranges from ultra-luxury names like The Ritz-Carlton, St. Regis, and EDITION to select-service staples such as Courtyard by Marriott and Fairfield Inn. The company generates revenue primarily through base management fees, franchise fees, and incentive management fees, making it a capital-light business with strong free cash flow generation.

In recent quarters, Marriott has demonstrated resilient operating performance despite macroeconomic uncertainty. Worldwide RevPAR grew 4.1% in the first quarter of 2025 and remained modestly positive at 0.5% in the third quarter, with international markets consistently outperforming the U.S. & Canada. The company's loyalty platform, Marriott Bonvoy, has grown to nearly 260 million members, driving higher direct bookings and deeper customer retention. Development momentum has remained robust, with a record pipeline of approximately 3,900 properties and over 596,000 rooms. The acquisition of the citizenM brand has further broadened its reach into the affordable lifestyle segment. Marriott has also returned approximately $3.1 billion to shareholders year-to-date through October 2025 via buybacks and dividends, underscoring management's confidence in cash flow durability. The stock's one-year return has substantially outperformed the broader hospitality sector, reflecting investor conviction in its premium brand positioning and global diversification.

WH Overview and Recent Performance

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts operates as a pure-play hotel franchisor with a portfolio of 25 brands including Super 8, Days Inn, La Quinta, Ramada, Travelodge, and Wyndham Grand. The company's system encompasses approximately 855,000 rooms across roughly 9,200 hotels in 95 countries, making it the world's largest hotel franchisor by property count. Its focus on the economy and midscale segments positions it to serve cost-conscious business and leisure travelers, a demographic that tends to be more sensitive to economic fluctuations but also benefits from trade-down demand during periods of financial pressure.

Recent performance has been mixed. Wyndham grew its system-wide room count by 4% year-over-year in recent quarters and has posted record development pipeline levels, surpassing 257,000 rooms. Ancillary revenues — which include loyalty program fees, credit card commissions, and other franchise-related services — have been a bright spot, rising 18% in the third quarter of 2025 compared to the prior year. However, global RevPAR declined approximately 5% in the same period, reflecting softer demand particularly in the domestic U.S. market. Full-year 2025 RevPAR guidance was revised to a decline of 3% to 2%. Adjusted diluted EPS grew 5% in the third quarter, aided by aggressive share repurchases, while net income increased modestly. The company continues to return capital to shareholders through a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share and regular buyback activity. The stock has lagged its larger peers over the past year, weighed down by concerns about the health of the economy-tier traveler and broader demand softness.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven approach to navigating stocks like MAR and WH, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers, but only the top performers that are best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this exclusive Trending section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term swing trading and pattern recognition to longer-term trend-following strategies — and display key statistics including win rates, trade volumes, annualized returns, and drawdown metrics. By observing which bots are trending, users can gain insight into the strategies and sectors that are currently resonating in the market. Explore the full selection of featured bots on the Trending AI Robots page to see which algorithms are navigating today's market with confidence.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking difference between MAR and WH is scale. Marriott generates annual revenues exceeding $26 billion, roughly 18 times Wyndham's $1.4 billion revenue base, and its market capitalization reflects a similar order-of-magnitude gap. This scale translates into competitive advantages: Marriott's loyalty program with nearly 260 million members creates a powerful network effect that Wyndham's more modest loyalty platform cannot easily replicate, and Marriott's brand diversity — from budget to ultra-luxury — gives it broader exposure to different travel demand patterns.

Segment positioning is the second critical differentiator. Wyndham's economy and midscale focus makes it more vulnerable to downturns in lower-income consumer spending, which has been under pressure amid persistent inflation and macroeconomic uncertainty. Marriott, by contrast, benefits from outsized exposure to luxury and premium travel, segments that have shown greater resilience. This dynamic is evident in recent RevPAR trends: Marriott's luxury properties posted RevPAR growth of 4% in recent quarters, while Wyndham's broader portfolio faced mid-single-digit declines.

On the development front, both companies are expanding, but Marriott's pipeline is more than twice the size of Wyndham's in room count terms. Marriott's pipeline also skews more heavily toward international markets — over half of pipeline rooms — while Wyndham's pipeline is roughly 58% international. Both are prioritizing conversions (rebranding existing hotels) as a faster and more capital-efficient growth path than new construction. Risk factors differ as well: Marriott carries higher absolute debt levels, while Wyndham operates with higher leverage ratios. Both face sector-wide risks tied to travel demand, geopolitical uncertainty, and foreign exchange volatility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative momentum, growth catalyst visibility, and market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor MAR over WH in the current environment. Marriott's combination of sustained positive RevPAR growth, a record development pipeline, premier brand positioning, and robust capital return capacity provides a more consistent fundamental backdrop. Its luxury-heavy portfolio has demonstrated greater resilience to macroeconomic headwinds, and the expanding Marriott Bonvoy platform continues to strengthen its competitive moat. Wyndham, while benefiting from record pipeline levels and strong ancillary revenue growth, faces near-term headwinds from weakening RevPAR trends in its core economy segment. That said, Wyndham's lower valuation multiple and higher dividend yield may appeal to value-oriented investors. This assessment reflects a probabilistic, data-informed perspective rather than a definitive prediction, and market conditions can shift rapidly.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MAR vs. WH commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAR is a Buy and WH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (MAR: $374.43 vs. WH: $73.53)
Brand notoriety: MAR: Notable vs. WH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAR: 59% vs. WH: 139%
Market capitalization -- MAR: $98.73B vs. WH: $5.46B
MAR [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $98.73B. WH’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $5.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $98.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $21.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the long-term than WH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the short-term than WH.

Price Growth

MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +2.24% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

WH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-2.57% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($98.7B) has a higher market cap than WH($5.46B). MAR has higher P/E ratio than WH: MAR (39.21) vs WH (26.64). MAR YTD gains are higher at: 21.162 vs. WH (-1.622). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.94B vs. WH (475M). WH has more cash in the bank: 749M vs. MAR (454M). WH has less debt than MAR: WH (2.65B) vs MAR (17.4B). MAR has higher revenues than WH: MAR (26.6B) vs WH (1.44B).
MARWHMAR / WH
Capitalization98.7B5.46B1,809%
EBITDA4.94B475M1,041%
Gain YTD21.162-1.622-1,305%
P/E Ratio39.2126.64147%
Revenue26.6B1.44B1,847%
Total Cash454M749M61%
Total Debt17.4B2.65B657%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAR vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
MAR
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1487
SMR RATING
1..100
430
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4973
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WH's Valuation (49) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAR (97). This means that WH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for WH (87). This means that MAR’s stock grew significantly faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (4) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (30). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (73). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (29). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MARWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGRO77.840.64
+0.83%
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
ACVF53.300.05
+0.10%
American Conservative Values ETF
MSFU23.47N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
USFI24.41N/A
N/A
BrandywineGLOBAL-U.S. Fixed Income ETF
RVNL31.33N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAR and ATAT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAR and ATAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
+2.73%
ATAT - MAR
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
HTHT - MAR
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
GHG - MAR
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
CHH - MAR
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
H - MAR
-3%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
More

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with CHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then CHH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
+0.07%
CHH - WH
68%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
HLT - WH
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
MAR - WH
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
H - WH
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
IHG - WH
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More