Advertisement
MARA vs WRLD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MARA is a Buy and WRLD is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MARA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MARA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WRLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MARA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MARA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WRLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MARA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while WRLD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +7.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.51%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
MARA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
WRLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.07% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.59% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| MARA | WRLD | MARA / WRLD | |
| Capitalization | 6.04B | 882M | 685% |
| EBITDA | 467M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.802 | 38.412 | -41% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.41 | 12.23 | 167% |
| Revenue | 388M | 526M | 74% |
| Total Cash | 357M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 326M | 667M | 49% |
MARA | WRLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRLD's Valuation (68) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MARA (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew similarly to MARA’s over the last 12 months.
WRLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MARA (80) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew similarly to MARA’s over the last 12 months.
WRLD's SMR Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MARA (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew significantly faster than MARA’s over the last 12 months.
WRLD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MARA (62) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew similarly to MARA’s over the last 12 months.
WRLD's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARA (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARA’s over the last 12 months.
| MARA | WRLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 10 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXU | 69.66 | 1.65 | +2.43% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN | |||
| DDIV | 37.48 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF | |||
| WIA | 8.19 | 0.01 | +0.18% |
| Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund | |||
| SEF | 33.42 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| ProShares Short Financials | |||
| XT | 61.23 | -0.33 | -0.54% |
| iShares Exponential Technologies ETF | |||
MARA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARA has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MARA jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| CLSK - MARA | 85% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| RIOT - MARA | 82% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| BITF - MARA | 76% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| HIVE - MARA | 75% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| BTBT - MARA | 72% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
WRLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLD has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WRLD jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRLD | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| ENVA - WRLD | 67% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| OMF - WRLD | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| URI - WRLD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| COF - WRLD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SYF - WRLD | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||