MBINL
Price
$22.89
Change
-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$7.10
Change
+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
87.03B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBINL vs MFG

Header iconMBINL vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts MBINL vs MFGBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$22.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Volume$18.24K
CapitalizationN/A
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$7.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.23M
Capitalization87.03B
MBINL vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
MBINL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINL vs. MFG commentary
Nov 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINL is a StrongBuy and MFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MBINL: $22.89 vs. MFG: $7.10)
Brand notoriety: MBINL and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINL: 69% vs. MFG: 48%
Market capitalization -- MBINL: $0 vs. MFG: $87.03B
MBINL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $87.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than MBINL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBINL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBINL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than MBINL.

Price Growth

MBINL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG YTD gains are higher at: 45.194 vs. MBINL (-3.947). MBINL has less debt than MFG: MBINL (3.83B) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than MBINL: MFG (3.61T) vs MBINL (665M).
MBINLMFGMBINL / MFG
CapitalizationN/A87B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.94745.194-9%
P/E RatioN/A13.77-
Revenue665M3.61T0%
Total Cash15.4MN/A-
Total Debt3.83B22.19T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
23
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBINLMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBINL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMAY29.340.25
+0.87%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - May
ISHG75.340.14
+0.18%
iShares 1-3 Year International TrsBd ETF
UFIV49.66-0.04
-0.09%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
TLH104.08-0.38
-0.36%
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
MPV20.15-0.09
-0.42%
Barings Participation Investors

MBINL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBINL and MBINN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBINL and MBINN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINL
1D Price
Change %
MBINL100%
-0.26%
MBINN - MBINL
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
MFG - MBINL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CARV - MBINL
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
VLYPN - MBINL
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
MBIN - MBINL
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.14%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
HBAN - MFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
DB - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
LYG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
More