MC
Price
$64.03
Change
-$0.22 (-0.34%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.74B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TXUG
Price
$27.07
Change
+$0.28 (+1.05%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
4.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs TXUG

MC vs TXUG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. TXUG commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a StrongBuy and TXUG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCTXUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (MC: $64.03)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while .

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -7.23% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.95% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TXUG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNGO150.232.97
+2.02%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ 2X Leveraged ETN
PAMC53.390.41
+0.78%
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
DFAU52.780.41
+0.78%
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
MBS8.40-0.03
-0.36%
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
GGRW36.94-0.47
-1.27%
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
-0.34%
EVR - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
PJT - MC
79%
Closely correlated
-4.97%
RJF - MC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
LAZ - MC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
PIPR - MC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

TXUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TXUG and ASML have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TXUG and ASML's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXUG
1D Price
Change %
TXUG100%
+1.08%
ASML - TXUG
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
ANET - TXUG
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
MC - TXUG
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
NU - TXUG
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
RACE - TXUG
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More