Semiconductor investors weighing a recovery in analog, embedded processing, and power chips often find themselves comparing MCHP and STM. Microchip Technology is a U.S.-based leader in microcontrollers, analog products, and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs, chips that can be reconfigured after manufacturing), while STMicroelectronics is a Franco-Italian diversified chipmaker with deep exposure to automotive, industrial, and increasingly AI data-center markets. This stock comparison is relevant to traders tracking cyclical turnarounds, momentum shifts, and AI-linked semiconductor demand. Understanding how their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles differ can help clarify market positioning across two of the sector's most closely watched recovery names.
Microchip Technology (MCHP) designs and manufactures microcontrollers, analog and mixed-signal devices, and FPGAs used across industrial, automotive, aerospace and defense, data-center, communications, and consumer markets. In recent weeks, MCHP has been framed by Wall Street as a broadening cyclical recovery story. Management has reported its strongest monthly bookings in roughly four years, with a book-to-bill ratio above 1, signaling that new orders are outpacing shipments.
Recent quarterly results showed revenue up nearly 38% year over year, supported by a nearly doubling of data-center sales and 45%-plus growth in aerospace and defense. Data center and compute now represents roughly 17-18% of sales, and the company expects data-center revenue to approach $1 billion in calendar 2026, up about 69% from 2025. Sentiment has also been lifted by new PCIe Gen 6 switch and retimer design wins, though external supply constraints, elevated long-term debt of roughly $5.4 billion, and a premium valuation remain key considerations.
STMicroelectronics (STM) is a global semiconductor manufacturer spanning analog, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS, tiny mechanical and electronic devices on a chip) and sensors, power and discrete products, microcontrollers, radio-frequency optical communications, and automotive solutions. Recent market activity has been more volatile for STM than for MCHP. The stock posted a strong year-to-date advance but has pulled back meaningfully from its 52-week high amid broader concerns about the sustainability of AI infrastructure spending.
Fundamentally, STM's recent quarterly results showed revenue rising about 26% year over year, with communications equipment and computer peripherals up roughly 50% and automotive and industrial demand improving. Gross margin recovered to the mid-30s percentage range, and the company raised its 2026 AI data-center revenue target above $1 billion, citing potential for more than $2 billion in 2027. Still, weakness persists in its power and discrete segment, which posted a negative operating margin, and management has flagged continued sensitivity to trade tariffs and currency moves.
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively monitor and trade thousands of different tickers, each running its own distinct strategy, timeframe, risk profile, and performance track record. Because market conditions change constantly, only a select group of bots is featured at any given time. Tickeron curates these top performers into its Trending AI Robots section, highlighting the bots judged most suitable for the current environment based on measurable statistics such as win rate, trade frequency, and profitability metrics. This curated view helps traders skip the noise and focus on strategies that are actively working today. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which automated strategies are currently leading the pack.
The two companies differ most clearly in market positioning and momentum. MCHP is concentrated on microcontrollers, analog, and FPGAs, with an outsized recent contribution from aerospace and defense (roughly 17% of sales) and data center. STM is more diversified across automotive, industrial, personal electronics, and communications, giving it broader end-market exposure but also greater sensitivity to European industrial demand and currency swings.
On growth catalysts, both are leaning on AI data-center expansion, but the scale and trajectory differ: MCHP's data-center revenue is smaller in absolute terms but growing faster, while STM is guiding toward a larger absolute data-center base in 2026-2027. On momentum, STM has delivered a stronger year-to-date return yet experienced a sharper recent drawdown, whereas MCHP's advance has been more measured and is supported by record bookings and lengthening lead times. Risk factors also diverge: MCHP carries elevated debt and a premium valuation, while STM contends with a loss-making power segment, thinner gross margins, and tariff/currency exposure. In short, MCHP offers a higher-margin, inventory-recovery and defense-linked profile, while STM presents a broader, more cyclical value-oriented turn with higher near-term volatility.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and catalyst visibility, Tickeron's AI models would likely express a modest preference for MCHP at the current juncture. The combination of record bookings, a book-to-bill ratio above 1, broadening end-market recovery, and a more orderly price advance suggests a steadier trend pattern. STM's stronger absolute momentum is offset by its recent pullback and lingering segment-level weakness, which can reduce trend reliability in automated scoring. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: the outlook can shift quickly as quarterly results, AI demand signals, and supply-chain conditions evolve.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
MCHP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 32 of 42 cases where MCHP's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +3.67% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MCHP advanced for three days, in 193 of 288 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MCHP as a result. In 78 of 96 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for MCHP turned negative on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 85%.
MCHP moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MCHP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 19, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The 50-day moving average for MCHP moved below the 200-day moving average on September 17, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MCHP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for MCHP entered a downward trend on September 24, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MCHP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.273) is normal, around the industry mean (6.008). P/E Ratio (109.588) is within average values for comparable stocks, (20.098). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.233) is also within normal values, averaging (3.761). Dividend Yield (0.024) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (7.446) is also within normal values, averaging (45.794).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MCHP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
STM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 37 of 43 cases where STM's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for STM's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 9 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +3.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where STM advanced for three days, in 206 of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on STM as a result. In 71 of 93 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for STM turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 51 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 84%.
STM moved below its 50-day moving average on October 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for STM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
The Aroon Indicator for STM entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.142) is normal, around the industry mean (6.008). STM's P/E Ratio (-881.800) is considerably lower than the industry average of (20.098). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.195) is also within normal values, averaging (3.761). Dividend Yield (0.007) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.370) is also within normal values, averaging (45.794).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. STM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. STM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
MCHP | STM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STM's Valuation (1) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHP (83). This means that STM’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as STM (100). This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to STM’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's SMR Rating (82) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as STM (91). This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to STM’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as STM (55). This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to STM’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as STM (100). This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to STM’s over the last 12 months.
| MCHP | STM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCHP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while STM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCHP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCHP (@Semiconductors) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while STM (@Semiconductors) price change was -5.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -8.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -19.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.20%.
MCHP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
STM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHP has been closely correlated with MCHPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHP jumps, then MCHPP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHP | 100% | -3.41% | ||
| MCHPP - MCHP | 99% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| TXN - MCHP | 81% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| ADI - MCHP | 80% Closely correlated | -4.98% | ||
| NXPI - MCHP | 79% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| ON - MCHP | 77% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||