MKC
Price
$54.67
Change
+$0.22 (+0.40%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
14.69B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SJM
Price
$121.39
Change
+$0.76 (+0.63%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
12.97B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKC vs SJM

MKC vs SJM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? McCormick & Company (MKC) vs. J.M. Smucker (SJM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • McCormick (MKC) and J.M. Smucker (SJM) are both consumer staples titans, but they derive strength from different product categories and pricing strategies.
  • MKC has benefited from persistent demand in spices, seasonings, and flavor solutions, while SJM has navigated portfolio reshaping through divestitures and acquisitions in coffee, pet food, and snacks.
  • Both stocks have faced input cost inflation and shifting consumer behavior, yet their defensive characteristics continue to attract investors seeking stability amid broader market uncertainty.
  • Recent momentum and relative strength indicators suggest diverging near-term paths, making this a timely head-to-head comparison.
  • Tickeron's AI-driven analysis weighs trend consistency, volatility, and catalyst strength — factors that currently tilt the scale toward one of these household names.

Introduction

When two consumer staples heavyweights like MKC and SJM compete for investor attention, the comparison goes beyond simple price charts. McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker both command deep brand loyalty, generate consistent cash flows, and pay reliable dividends — qualities that resonate with long-term investors. Yet beneath the surface, these companies are navigating different strategic paths, from McCormick's global flavor dominance to Smucker's ongoing portfolio transformation. For swing traders evaluating momentum and institutional investors assessing defensive positioning, understanding how these two stocks compare in the current market environment is essential. This article examines recent performance, business fundamentals, and what Tickeron's AI-driven analysis reveals about their relative positioning.

MKC Overview and Recent Performance

McCormick & Company (MKC) is a global leader in spices, seasonings, condiments, and flavor solutions, serving both consumer and foodservice markets across more than 150 countries. The company's portfolio includes iconic brands such as McCormick, French's, Frank's RedHot, and Lawry's. In recent weeks, MKC shares have displayed relatively stable trading patterns characteristic of consumer staples in a risk-averse market environment. The company has continued to execute on its pricing strategies to offset lingering input cost pressures, particularly in raw materials like pepper, vanilla, and packaging. Recent quarterly results highlighted steady demand in the consumer segment, while the flavor solutions division — which supplies restaurants and food manufacturers — has shown resilience as global foodservice activity normalizes. Investor sentiment has been shaped by McCormick's ability to maintain margins through strategic price increases without sacrificing volume to a degree that alarms the market. Additionally, the company's international exposure provides a growth avenue that pure-play domestic staples peers may lack.

SJM Overview and Recent Performance

J.M. Smucker Company (SJM) operates across a diversified portfolio spanning coffee, pet food, snacks, and spreads. Its well-known brands include Folgers, Jif, Uncrustables, Milk-Bone, and Meow Mix. In recent market activity, SJM shares have reflected the complexities of a company in active portfolio transition. The acquisition of Hostess Brands, completed in late 2023, expanded Smucker's footprint into sweet baked snacks, while the divestiture of several lower-margin product lines has reshaped its revenue mix. Over recent weeks, attention has focused on integration synergies from the Hostess deal and the performance of the pet food segment, where competition has intensified. The coffee business, anchored by the Folgers brand, faces a dynamic environment with fluctuating green coffee bean costs and evolving at-home consumption patterns. Smucker's recent earnings reports have shown the balancing act between leveraging brand strength and managing debt levels following significant M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity. The stock's performance has reflected cautious optimism about the Hostess integration, tempered by broader concerns about consumer spending on premium pet food and snacks.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like MKC and SJM, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments, but only a select group earns placement in this trending section. These bots employ varied trading styles — from short-term swing trading and trend following to longer-term pattern recognition — and display transparent performance statistics, including win rates, trade frequency, and historical returns. Some featured bots have demonstrated win rates exceeding 70%, while others specialize in specific sectors or volatility profiles. Each bot's strategy, timeframe, and ticker universe differ, allowing users to find approaches aligned with their goals. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently being highlighted.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model and Revenue Mix: McCormick generates revenue across two roughly balanced segments — consumer spices and seasonings, and flavor solutions for industrial clients. This dual structure provides diversification across retail shelves and foodservice supply chains. J.M. Smucker, by contrast, is more concentrated around branded consumer packaged goods, with coffee representing a significant portion of sales, supplemented by pet food and snacks. The Hostess acquisition has tilted SJM further toward indulgent snacking, a category with different demand elasticities than McCormick's core offerings.

Growth Drivers: MKC's growth is tied to global flavor trends, emerging market expansion, and foodservice recovery. Consumers cooking at home and experimenting with new cuisines support demand for McCormick's products. SJM's growth narrative centers on the Uncrustables brand scaling toward $1 billion in annual revenue, pet food premiumization through Milk-Bone and Meow Mix, and cross-synergy opportunities from the Hostess distribution network.

Risk Factors: McCormick faces exposure to volatile agricultural commodity prices and currency translation effects from its international operations. Smucker contends with higher leverage following the Hostess acquisition, integration execution risk, and competitive pressure in pet food from both premium entrants and private-label alternatives.

Market Sentiment and Momentum: In the current environment, defensive dividend payers have attracted capital, but relative strength differs. McCormick's steadier earnings trajectory and global diversification have drawn favor, while Smucker's post-M&A transition has introduced near-term uncertainty. Technical signals and AI-driven trend analysis have pointed to more consistent directional conviction in one of these two names.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, recent momentum patterns, and the relative clarity of earnings drivers, Tickeron's AI analysis currently favors MKC over SJM. McCormick's more predictable dual-segment revenue model, global footprint, and steadier post-pandemic demand trajectory provide a more stable backdrop for trend-following algorithms. While Smucker's Hostess integration and Uncrustables growth story offer compelling long-term potential, the near-term complexity from elevated leverage and portfolio restructuring introduces variables that AI models typically interpret as risk factors. It is important to note that this assessment reflects probabilistic modeling rather than a definitive prediction — market conditions, earnings surprises, and macroeconomic shifts can rapidly alter the relative positioning of both stocks. Investors should view this AI-driven perspective as one input within a broader, well-rounded decision-making framework.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MKC vs. SJM commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKC is a StrongBuy and SJM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (MKC: $54.67 vs. SJM: $121.39)
Brand notoriety: MKC and SJM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKC: 43% vs. SJM: 63%
Market capitalization -- MKC: $14.69B vs. SJM: $12.97B
MKC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $14.69B. SJM’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $12.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MKC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJM is a better buy in the long-term than MKC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MKC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MKC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SJM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKC is a better buy in the short-term than SJM.

Price Growth

MKC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.23% price change this week, while SJM (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MKC is expected to report earnings on Oct 06, 2026.

SJM is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.33% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKC($14.7B) has a higher market cap than SJM($13B). SJM has higher P/E ratio than MKC: SJM (22.05) vs MKC (9.10). SJM YTD gains are higher at: 27.929 vs. MKC (-18.283). MKC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39B vs. SJM (876M). MKC has less debt than SJM: MKC (4.93B) vs SJM (7.09B). SJM has higher revenues than MKC: SJM (9.05B) vs MKC (7.39B).
MKCSJMMKC / SJM
Capitalization14.7B13B113%
EBITDA1.39B876M159%
Gain YTD-18.28327.929-65%
P/E Ratio9.1022.0541%
Revenue7.39B9.05B82%
Total Cash331MN/A-
Total Debt4.93B7.09B70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKC vs SJM: Fundamental Ratings
MKC
SJM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2937
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
3892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5727
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MKC's Valuation (16) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SJM (17). This means that MKC’s stock grew similarly to SJM’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MKC (100). This means that SJM’s stock grew similarly to MKC’s over the last 12 months.

MKC's SMR Rating (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SJM (92). This means that MKC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SJM’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MKC (57). This means that SJM’s stock grew similarly to MKC’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKC (97). This means that SJM’s stock grew significantly faster than MKC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MKCSJM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MKC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SJM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGVT76.771.44
+1.91%
Ingevity Corp
QUAD9.940.13
+1.33%
QUAD/GRAPHICS
MTNB0.23N/A
+0.43%
Matinas Biopharma Holdings Inc
ARCC19.87-0.32
-1.58%
Ares Capital Corp
YIBO1.22-0.09
-6.87%
Planet Image International Limited

SJM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJM has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJM jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJM
1D Price
Change %
SJM100%
+1.57%
GIS - SJM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CAG - SJM
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
KHC - SJM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
TR - SJM
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
MKC - SJM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More