Advertisement
MNDR vs SOPH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNDR is a Hold and SOPH is a Hold.
| MNDR | SOPH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SOPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MNDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SOPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNDR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SOPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MNDR (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while SOPH (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
SOPH is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.81% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
Advertisement
MNDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNDR has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNDR jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNDR | 100% | -4.51% | ||
| SPT - MNDR | 60% Loosely correlated | +6.24% | ||
| AMPL - MNDR | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| OTEX - MNDR | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| U - MNDR | 39% Loosely correlated | +6.55% | ||
| DRIO - MNDR | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.95% | ||
More | ||||
SOPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOPH and TEM have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOPH and TEM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOPH | 100% | -4.18% | ||
| TEM - SOPH | 33% Poorly correlated | -6.59% | ||
| RIOT - SOPH | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.68% | ||
| COIN - SOPH | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| MNDR - SOPH | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.51% | ||
| PSFE - SOPH | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||