It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMEX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.62% price change this week, while OMEX (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.69%.
MP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
OMEX is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| MP | OMEX | MP / OMEX | |
| Capitalization | 8.81B | 39.4M | 22,365% |
| EBITDA | 29.5M | -43.88M | -67% |
| Gain YTD | -2.019 | -65.638 | 3% |
| P/E Ratio | 770.50 | 5.15 | 14,950% |
| Revenue | 254M | 241K | 105,394% |
| Total Cash | 1.74B | 2.1M | 82,605% |
| Total Debt | 1B | 4.87M | 20,534% |
MP | OMEX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 18 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMEX's Valuation (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MP (92) in the null industry. This means that OMEX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MP’s over the last 12 months.
MP's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as OMEX (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to OMEX’s over the last 12 months.
MP's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as OMEX (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to OMEX’s over the last 12 months.
MP's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as OMEX (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to OMEX’s over the last 12 months.
MP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as OMEX (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to OMEX’s over the last 12 months.
| MP | OMEX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 18 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been closely correlated with USAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MP jumps, then USAR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMEX has been loosely correlated with TMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMEX jumps, then TMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMEX | 100% | -4.77% | ||
| TMC - OMEX | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| CRML - OMEX | 50% Loosely correlated | -6.29% | ||
| NB - OMEX | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.93% | ||
| USAR - OMEX | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.87% | ||
| FNUC - OMEX | 41% Loosely correlated | -8.94% | ||
More | ||||