MP
Price
$65.59
Change
-$1.82 (-2.70%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
11.68B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USAR
Price
$25.55
Change
-$0.75 (-2.85%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.57B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MP vs USAR

Header iconMP vs USAR Comparison
Open Charts MP vs USARBanner chart's image
MP vs USAR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? MP Materials Corp. (MP) vs. USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both MP and USAR focus on rare earth materials essential for electric vehicles (EVs), defense, and technology, but MP is a scaled producer while USAR emphasizes development and acquisitions.
  • In recent market activity, USAR has shown sharper momentum with a 63% gain over the past month compared to MP's 17% rise.
  • MP boasts a market cap of approximately $11.8 billion and TTM revenue of $275 million, dwarfing USAR's $5.7 billion cap and $1.6 million revenue.
  • Year-to-date, USAR leads with 119% gains versus MP's 32%, reflecting acquisition-driven sentiment for USAR.
  • Risk profiles differ: MP offers production stability, while USAR carries higher volatility from its pre-production stage.
  • Government support bolsters both, with MP advancing magnet manufacturing and USAR securing a $2.8 billion Brazilian asset deal.

Introduction

This stock comparison pits MP Materials Corp. against USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR), two key players in the rare earth sector amid rising demand for critical minerals used in EVs, renewable energy, and defense technologies. Investors seeking exposure to supply chain diversification away from China, as well as traders eyeing momentum in materials stocks, will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth catalysts, and risk factors. With both exhibiting strong recent gains driven by strategic expansions, this head-to-head highlights trade-offs in scale, execution, and market positioning in the current environment.

MP Overview and Recent Performance

MP Materials Corp. operates the Mountain Pass mine in California, the only active rare earth mine and processing facility in the U.S., spanning mining, separation, and now magnetics production including neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) oxide and neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets. In recent weeks, the stock has climbed around 17% over the past month, trading near $67 amid broader yearly gains exceeding 165%. Sentiment has been buoyed by record NdPr oxide production up 101% year-over-year, first commercial NdFeB magnets, a new "10X" magnet campus in Texas, and government incentives totaling $200 million. These developments underscore operational momentum and U.S. supply chain resilience, though profitability remains challenged with TTM losses.

USAR Overview and Recent Performance

USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) is advancing a vertically integrated supply chain for rare earths and critical minerals via its Round Top project in Texas and a planned NdFeB magnet facility in Oklahoma. Recent market activity has propelled shares up 63% in the past month to around $26, with year-to-date returns at 119%. Key influences include a transformative $2.8 billion acquisition of Brazil's Serra Verde rare earth miner and progress toward production in Stillwater, fueling a 72% April surge. While these catalysts have shifted sentiment positively, the company remains pre-revenue at scale with significant losses, highlighting execution risks in its expansion strategy.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available agents that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Currently featuring 25 standout bots suited to prevailing market conditions, these include short-term scalpers (5-60 minutes) and swing traders with annualized returns ranging from 23% to 162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and focuses on areas like semiconductors, industrials, volatility plays (including USAR), and space stocks. Traders can explore performance stats, backtests, and copy trading options to align with their risk tolerance and goals.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MP and USAR share rare earth exposure but diverge in business models: MP as an established integrated producer versus USAR's development-stage focus on acquisitions like Serra Verde. Growth drivers for MP include scaled NdPr output and magnetics ramp-up with government backing, while USAR bets on Round Top and Oklahoma facility execution. Recent momentum favors USAR's volatility (28% vs. 22%), but MP offers superior revenue scale and stability. Risks encompass commodity price swings and permitting delays for both, with USAR facing higher execution hurdles. Market sentiment tilts toward domestic supply chain plays, positioning MP as the steadier bet amid sector tailwinds.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MP for its trend consistency, tangible production milestones, and larger scale relative to USAR's promising but riskier acquisition-driven path. Factors like government-supported catalysts and lower volatility suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance in the near term, though USAR could close the gap on successful integration.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MP vs. USAR commentary
May 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MP is a Hold and USAR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (MP: $65.59 vs. USAR: $25.55)
Brand notoriety: MP and USAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MP: 98% vs. USAR: 93%
Market capitalization -- MP: $11.68B vs. USAR: $5.57B
MP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $11.68B. USAR’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $4.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than USAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USAR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USAR is a better buy in the short-term than MP.

Price Growth

MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while USAR (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +9.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

USAR is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+9.76% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($11.7B) has a higher market cap than USAR($5.57B). MP has higher P/E ratio than USAR: MP (770.50) vs USAR (20.27). USAR YTD gains are higher at: 114.706 vs. MP (29.830). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.5M vs. USAR (-242.86M). MP has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. USAR (258M). USAR has less debt than MP: USAR (1.31M) vs MP (1B). MP has higher revenues than USAR: MP (254M) vs USAR (0).
MPUSARMP / USAR
Capitalization11.7B5.57B210%
EBITDA29.5M-242.86M-12%
Gain YTD29.830114.70626%
P/E Ratio770.5020.273,802%
Revenue254M0-
Total Cash1.74B258M674%
Total Debt1B1.31M76,336%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MP: Fundamental Ratings
MP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPUSAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXED17.750.06
+0.36%
Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF
YEAR50.32-0.02
-0.04%
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
OAKG24.97-0.07
-0.27%
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF
WDIV80.82-0.24
-0.30%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Div ETF
GTPE57.89-0.72
-1.23%
Goldman Sachs MSCI Wld Priv Eq RtTrkrETF

USAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAR has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAR jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAR
1D Price
Change %
USAR100%
-2.85%
MP - USAR
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
NB - USAR
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
UAMY - USAR
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
CRML - USAR
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
TMC - USAR
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
More