MSGM
Price
$4.45
Change
-$0.16 (-3.47%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
18.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAGS
Price
$9.28
Change
+$0.03 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.59B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSGM vs PAGS

MSGM vs PAGS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSGM vs. PAGS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGM is a Buy and PAGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MSGM: $4.45 vs. PAGS: $9.28)
Brand notoriety: MSGM and PAGS are both not notable
MSGM represents the Electronics/Appliances, while PAGS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSGM: 9% vs. PAGS: 85%
Market capitalization -- MSGM: $18.57M vs. PAGS: $2.59B
MSGM [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $18.57M. PAGS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.47B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSGM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSGM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSGM is a better buy in the long-term than PAGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSGM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSGM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAGS is a better buy in the short-term than MSGM.

Price Growth

MSGM (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а -7.10% price change this week, while PAGS (@Computer Communications) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.34%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (+0.29% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

@Computer Communications (-4.12% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAGS($2.59B) has a higher market cap than MSGM($18.6M). PAGS has higher P/E ratio than MSGM: PAGS (6.57) vs MSGM (3.84). MSGM YTD gains are higher at: 40.379 vs. PAGS (-0.413). PAGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.97B vs. MSGM (7.58M). PAGS has more cash in the bank: 4.42B vs. MSGM (5.86M). MSGM has less debt than PAGS: MSGM (362K) vs PAGS (44B). PAGS has higher revenues than MSGM: PAGS (20.6B) vs MSGM (13.6M).
MSGMPAGSMSGM / PAGS
Capitalization18.6M2.59B1%
EBITDA7.58M8.97B0%
Gain YTD40.379-0.413-9,774%
P/E Ratio3.846.5758%
Revenue13.6M20.6B0%
Total Cash5.86M4.42B0%
Total Debt362K44B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAGS: Fundamental Ratings
PAGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSGMPAGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSGM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDEV12.300.19
+1.57%
GDEV Inc
RDN38.010.17
+0.45%
Radian Group
MFC41.29N/A
N/A
Manulife Financial Corp
LAC3.14-0.18
-5.42%
Lithium Americas Corp
MYND0.38-0.03
-6.61%
Myndai

MSGM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSGM and TROO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSGM and TROO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSGM
1D Price
Change %
MSGM100%
-3.47%
TROO - MSGM
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
DT - MSGM
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
VRNS - MSGM
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
RSSS - MSGM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
PAGS - MSGM
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More