MTB
Price
$179.95
Change
-$5.79 (-3.12%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
24.23B
55 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$21.32
Change
-$0.93 (-4.18%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.9B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB vs RF

Header iconMTB vs RF Comparison
Open Charts MTB vs RFBanner chart's image
M&T Bank
Price$179.95
Change-$5.79 (-3.12%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization24.23B
Regions Financial
Price$21.32
Change-$0.93 (-4.18%)
Volume$6.42M
Capitalization18.9B
MTB vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTB vs. RF commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTB is a Buy and RF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (MTB: $179.95 vs. RF: $21.32)
Brand notoriety: MTB: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 92% vs. RF: 70%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $24.23B vs. RF: $18.9B
MTB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.23B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than MTB.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.94% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($24.2B) has a higher market cap than RF($18.9B). RF has higher P/E ratio than MTB: RF (9.74) vs MTB (9.07). MTB YTD gains are higher at: -3.608 vs. RF (-8.388). RF has less debt than MTB: RF (2.33B) vs MTB (13.2B). MTB has higher revenues than RF: MTB (9.4B) vs RF (7.57B).
MTBRFMTB / RF
Capitalization24.2B18.9B128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.608-8.38843%
P/E Ratio9.079.7493%
Revenue9.4B7.57B124%
Total CashN/A1.55B-
Total Debt13.2B2.33B567%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1420
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3328
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2954
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (71) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (100) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (50) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (54) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TTNP4.490.14
+3.22%
Titan Pharmaceuticals
NI38.85-0.66
-1.67%
NiSource
STRA88.37-1.83
-2.03%
Strategic Education
DBI3.22-0.24
-6.94%
Designer Brands
KLXE1.87-0.16
-7.88%
KLX Energy Services Holdings

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
-3.12%
SNV - MTB
91%
Closely correlated
-3.97%
FITB - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
-3.79%
CFG - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
-4.02%
HWC - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
FNB - MTB
88%
Closely correlated
-3.56%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
-4.18%
PNC - RF
81%
Closely correlated
-2.94%
HBAN - RF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.89%
FITB - RF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.79%
MTB - RF
80%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
TRST - RF
79%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
More