MTLS
Price
$6.02
Change
-$0.06 (-0.99%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
353.8M
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$84.43
Change
-$1.91 (-2.21%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
25B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTLS vs ZM

Header iconMTLS vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts MTLS vs ZMBanner chart's image
Materialise
Price$6.02
Change-$0.06 (-0.99%)
Volume$62.39K
Capitalization353.8M
Zoom Communications
Price$84.43
Change-$1.91 (-2.21%)
Volume$5.2M
Capitalization25B
MTLS vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MTLS vs. ZM commentary
Nov 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTLS is a StrongBuy and ZM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MTLS: $6.02 vs. ZM: $84.43)
Brand notoriety: MTLS: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTLS: 35% vs. ZM: 174%
Market capitalization -- MTLS: $353.8M vs. ZM: $25B
MTLS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $353.8M. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $275.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MTLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTLS is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTLS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTLS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTLS is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

MTLS (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTLS is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.99% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($25B) has a higher market cap than MTLS($354M). MTLS has higher P/E ratio than ZM: MTLS (65.33) vs ZM (16.43). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 3.455 vs. MTLS (-14.489). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. MTLS (30.1M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. MTLS (132M). ZM has less debt than MTLS: ZM (54.3M) vs MTLS (64.3M). ZM has higher revenues than MTLS: ZM (4.75B) vs MTLS (263M).
MTLSZMMTLS / ZM
Capitalization354M25B1%
EBITDA30.1M1.11B3%
Gain YTD-14.4893.455-419%
P/E Ratio65.3316.43398%
Revenue263M4.75B6%
Total Cash132M7.78B2%
Total Debt64.3M54.3M118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTLS vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
MTLS
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6961
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8556
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (78) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (88) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (85) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.

MTLS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZM (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MTLS’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

MTLS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZM (88) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MTLS’s stock grew significantly faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTLSZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCSHF7.630.25
+3.39%
Lancashire Holdings Ltd.
HESAY248.782.52
+1.02%
Hermes International SA
KNNGF66.45N/A
N/A
KION GROUP AG
LHYFF4.72N/A
N/A
LHYFE S A
VBAMF0.16N/A
N/A
AVENTIS ENERGY INC.

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
-2.21%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.27%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
+13.79%
RNG - ZM
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
FRSH - ZM
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
COMP - ZM
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
More