Ad is loading...
COMP
Price
$7.09
Change
-$0.11 (-1.53%)
Updated
Nov 29 closing price
92 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$82.69
Change
-$2.67 (-3.13%)
Updated
Nov 29 closing price
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COMP vs ZM

Header iconCOMP vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts COMP vs ZMBanner chart's image
Compass
Price$7.09
Change-$0.11 (-1.53%)
Volume$1.86M
CapitalizationN/A
Zoom Communications
Price$82.69
Change-$2.67 (-3.13%)
Volume$3.23M
CapitalizationN/A
COMP vs ZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COMP vs. ZM commentary
Dec 02, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMP is a StrongBuy and ZM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 02, 2024
Stock price -- (COMP: $7.09 vs. ZM: $82.69)
Brand notoriety: COMP: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
COMP represents the Real Estate Development, while ZM is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COMP: 46% vs. ZM: 96%
Market capitalization -- COMP: $1.75B vs. ZM: $20.11B
COMP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.75B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COMP is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COMP is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

COMP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.81% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.23%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

COMP is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

@Packaged Software (+2.23% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($20.1B) has a higher market cap than COMP($1.75B). COMP YTD gains are higher at: 88.564 vs. ZM (14.991). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 630M vs. COMP (-216.4M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. COMP (167M). ZM has less debt than COMP: ZM (73M) vs COMP (534M). COMP has higher revenues than ZM: COMP (4.89B) vs ZM (4.53B).
COMPZMCOMP / ZM
Capitalization1.75B20.1B9%
EBITDA-216.4M630M-34%
Gain YTD88.56414.991591%
P/E RatioN/A31.27-
Revenue4.89B4.53B108%
Total Cash167M6.96B2%
Total Debt534M73M732%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COMPZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XYLO3.920.27
+7.40%
Xylo Technologies Ltd
DOUG2.540.16
+6.72%
Douglas Elliman
MOV20.35-0.02
-0.10%
Movado Group
ALLE140.84-0.57
-0.40%
Allegion Public Limited
RVLV36.08-0.85
-2.30%
Revolve Group

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
-3.13%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.75%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
COMP - ZM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
RIOT - ZM
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
HOOD - ZM
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More