Advertisement
MTW vs UGRO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTW is a Buy and UGRO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUGRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MTW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UGRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UGRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UGRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MTW (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -4.61% price change this week, while UGRO (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -12.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
UGRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-2.06% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| MTW | UGRO | MTW / UGRO | |
| Capitalization | 345M | 6.23M | 5,537% |
| EBITDA | 95.2M | -13.91M | -684% |
| Gain YTD | 6.572 | -48.656 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.78 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.13B | 70.3M | 3,031% |
| Total Cash | 32.9M | 693K | 4,747% |
| Total Debt | 525M | 4.46M | 11,779% |
MTW | UGRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTW's Valuation (60) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as UGRO (87) in the null industry. This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to UGRO’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as UGRO (100) in the null industry. This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to UGRO’s over the last 12 months.
MTW's SMR Rating (79) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as UGRO (98) in the null industry. This means that MTW’s stock grew similarly to UGRO’s over the last 12 months.
UGRO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MTW (60) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that UGRO’s stock grew similarly to MTW’s over the last 12 months.
UGRO's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MTW (100) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that UGRO’s stock grew similarly to MTW’s over the last 12 months.
| MTW | UGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
UGRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UGRO and HY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UGRO and HY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UGRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGRO | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| HY - UGRO | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
| HYFM - UGRO | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ASTE - UGRO | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
| TEX - UGRO | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| MTW - UGRO | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||