MULN vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MULN is a Hold and PANW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MULN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MULN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MULN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MULN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PANW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MULN (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -10.92% price change this week, while PANW (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
MULN is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+1.97% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
@Packaged Software (+3.82% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MULN | PANW | MULN / PANW | |
| Capitalization | 34.1M | 90.2B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -686.05M | 1.15B | -59% |
| Gain YTD | -99.926 | 27.849 | -359% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.00 | 43.23 | 0% |
| Revenue | 366K | 7.53B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 81.5M | 3.37B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 19M | 2.18B | 1% |
MULN | PANW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MULN's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PANW (79) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that MULN’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (16) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MULN (98) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to MULN’s over the last 12 months.
| MULN | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
MULN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MULN and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MULN and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MULN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MULN | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| AYRO - MULN | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| F - MULN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| GM - MULN | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| WKHS - MULN | 21% Poorly correlated | +8.13% | ||
| CENN - MULN | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| EXSPF - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PSSWF - PANW | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMPL - PANW | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| S - PANW | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||