NBHC
Price
$41.85
Change
+$0.19 (+0.46%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRMK
Price
$46.52
Change
-$0.06 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBHC vs TRMK

NBHC vs TRMK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBHC vs. TRMK commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHC is a Hold and TRMK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (NBHC: $41.85 vs. TRMK: $46.52)
Brand notoriety: NBHC and TRMK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBHC: 58% vs. TRMK: 63%
Market capitalization -- NBHC: $1.86B vs. TRMK: $2.7B
NBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.86B. TRMK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRMK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRMK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRMK is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRMK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRMK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRMK is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

NBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while TRMK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

TRMK is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRMK($2.7B) has a higher market cap than NBHC($1.86B). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than TRMK: NBHC (17.58) vs TRMK (11.84). TRMK YTD gains are higher at: 20.794 vs. NBHC (11.821). NBHC has less debt than TRMK: NBHC (202M) vs TRMK (563M). TRMK has higher revenues than NBHC: TRMK (693M) vs NBHC (436M).
NBHCTRMKNBHC / TRMK
Capitalization1.86B2.7B69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.82120.79457%
P/E Ratio17.5811.84149%
Revenue436M693M63%
Total Cash369MN/A-
Total Debt202M563M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBHC vs TRMK: Fundamental Ratings
NBHC
TRMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6841
SMR RATING
1..100
5135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBHC's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (53). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (68). This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (51). This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (57). This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

NBHC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (35). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBHCTRMK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRMK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENOR36.790.44
+1.21%
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
FFOX30.320.26
+0.87%
Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF
CGUI25.360.01
+0.04%
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
HF22.79N/A
N/A
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF
IGEB44.14-0.03
-0.08%
iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with FCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then FCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
+0.46%
FCF - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
CATY - NBHC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
TRMK - NBHC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
FFBC - NBHC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
PEBO - NBHC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More