PFS
Price
$23.52
Change
-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.06B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRMK
Price
$46.39
Change
+$0.12 (+0.26%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.72B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs TRMK

PFS vs TRMK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. TRMK commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a Hold and TRMK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (PFS: $23.51 vs. TRMK: $46.27)
Brand notoriety: PFS and TRMK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 75% vs. TRMK: 64%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $3.06B vs. TRMK: $2.72B
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.06B. TRMK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRMK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRMK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRMK is a better buy in the long-term than PFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRMK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRMK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRMK is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while TRMK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

TRMK is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($3.06B) has a higher market cap than TRMK($2.72B). TRMK has higher P/E ratio than PFS: TRMK (12.30) vs PFS (10.00). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 21.620 vs. TRMK (20.456). TRMK has less debt than PFS: TRMK (563M) vs PFS (2.8B). PFS has higher revenues than TRMK: PFS (887M) vs TRMK (693M).
PFSTRMKPFS / TRMK
Capitalization3.06B2.72B113%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.62020.456106%
P/E Ratio10.0012.3081%
Revenue887M693M128%
Total Cash211MN/A-
Total Debt2.8B563M497%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs TRMK: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
TRMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7245
SMR RATING
1..100
3134
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (17) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRMK (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (34) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSTRMK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRMK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHI51.34N/A
N/A
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
DDIV46.04N/A
N/A
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF
UBEW27.99-0.12
-0.44%
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
MFSG29.75-0.53
-1.75%
MFS Active Growth ETF
DFEN72.15-3.92
-5.15%
Direxion Dly Aerospace&Def Bl 3X ShsETF

TRMK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRMK has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRMK jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRMK
1D Price
Change %
TRMK100%
+0.26%
UBSI - TRMK
89%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
UCB - TRMK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
PFS - TRMK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
CATY - TRMK
86%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BUSE - TRMK
86%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More