It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NCLH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NCLH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NCLH (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +7.43% price change this week, while TNL (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +2.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.
NCLH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
TNL is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
NCLH | TNL | NCLH / TNL | |
Capitalization | 8.91B | 3.4B | 262% |
EBITDA | 1.77B | 848M | 209% |
Gain YTD | 24.152 | 28.502 | 85% |
P/E Ratio | 53.69 | 9.19 | 584% |
Revenue | 8.55B | 3.75B | 228% |
Total Cash | 402M | 314M | 128% |
Total Debt | 14.1B | 5.73B | 246% |
NCLH | TNL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TNL's Valuation (11) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (71). This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (100). This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's SMR Rating (4) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as NCLH (12). This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
NCLH's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNL (43). This means that NCLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNL’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (93). This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
NCLH | TNL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 4 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago83% | 24 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PSCM | 76.22 | 0.62 | +0.82% |
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | |||
BUFG | 23.99 | 0.06 | +0.25% |
FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF | |||
EFAD | 39.15 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers | |||
VTWV | 144.89 | -0.04 | -0.03% |
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | |||
EWJ | 67.98 | -0.09 | -0.13% |
iShares MSCI Japan ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NCLH | 100% | -1.82% | ||
CCL - NCLH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
RCL - NCLH | 70% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
LIND - NCLH | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
ABNB - NCLH | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
TNL - NCLH | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been loosely correlated with SABR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then SABR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TNL | 100% | +1.57% | ||
SABR - TNL | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
CCL - TNL | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
ABNB - TNL | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
LIND - TNL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
NCLH - TNL | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More |