Advertisement
NCLH vs WANT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCLH is a Hold and WANT is a Hold.
NCLH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NCLH | WANT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NCLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while .
- NCLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NCLH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NCLH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NCLH (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -4.82% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
NCLH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (-1.36% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| APLX | 8.34 | 0.34 | +4.25% |
| Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF | |||
| FDRR | 70.06 | 0.79 | +1.14% |
| Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | |||
| NAPR | 60.33 | 0.20 | +0.34% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr | |||
| IBGB | 23.02 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| JCPB | 45.47 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
NCLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| CCL - NCLH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| RCL - NCLH | 75% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| VIK - NCLH | 66% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| LIND - NCLH | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| TNL - NCLH | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
WANT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WANT has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WANT jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WANT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WANT | 100% | +2.49% | ||
| CCL - WANT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| HD - WANT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MHK - WANT | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| NCLH - WANT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| RL - WANT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||