NLR
Price
$119.19
Change
+$2.16 (+1.85%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
4.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URNJ
Price
$25.89
Change
+$1.09 (+4.40%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
375.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs URNJ

NLR vs URNJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 04, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ)

Key Takeaways

  • NLR offers broad exposure across the nuclear energy value chain, including uranium miners, utilities, and equipment providers, while URNJ concentrates on junior uranium mining companies.
  • NLR maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.52% compared to URNJ at 0.80%, potentially supporting better long-term cost efficiency.
  • NLR holds 25–29 securities with significant allocations to utilities and industrials; URNJ typically features 30–45 holdings focused on smaller-cap pure-play miners, resulting in higher concentration risk.
  • Both ETFs provide thematic exposure to nuclear power and uranium demand driven by global energy transition and electricity needs, but differ in risk profiles due to market-cap and sector focus.
  • NLR tracks the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with quarterly rebalancing considerations, whereas URNJ follows the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index emphasizing mid-, small-, and micro-cap issuers.
  • Structural differences position NLR for potentially more stable sector representation and URNJ for amplified upside in uranium price cycles, influencing relative positioning in market environments.

Introduction

Investors seeking nuclear energy exposure often compare NLR and URNJ because both target uranium and nuclear-related equities yet pursue distinct strategies within the same thematic sector. NLR delivers diversified access to the full nuclear ecosystem, while URNJ emphasizes smaller mining operators. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as alternative vehicles for investors pursuing energy transition themes, differing in diversification, cost, and volatility characteristics that suit varying risk tolerances and portfolio objectives in the current market environment.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is a passive fund that seeks to replicate the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. The index includes companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear power facility construction and maintenance, electricity production from nuclear sources, and related equipment or services. The ETF typically holds 25–29 securities, with top holdings often including CEG, Cameco, and various utilities. Sector allocations generally feature substantial weights in energy and utilities alongside industrials. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.52% and employs physical replication with periodic index reviews. Distinguishing features include broader ecosystem exposure that blends miners with downstream nuclear operators, supporting a more balanced risk profile than pure mining strategies.

Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) Overview

The Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) is a passive fund designed to track the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index. The index focuses on mid-, small-, and micro-cap companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or assets from uranium mining, exploration, royalties, or supply. The ETF generally contains 30–45 holdings, with top positions concentrated in junior miners such as Denison Mines and Paladin Energy. Allocations center almost exclusively on the materials or energy sector within uranium mining. It features a net expense ratio of 0.80% and uses physical replication with semi-annual rebalancing. Key characteristics include targeted exposure to smaller operators, which can amplify sensitivity to uranium price movements and development-stage risks compared with broader nuclear funds.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The nuclear energy and uranium sectors operate amid rising global electricity demand, policy support for low-carbon baseload power, and efforts to secure energy supplies. Capital flows have increased toward uranium-related assets as nations expand or restart nuclear capacity. Regulatory developments, including permitting reforms and international supply agreements, influence project timelines. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate trajectories and commodity price cycles affect mining economics, while geopolitical factors can impact supply chains from key producing regions. Sector risks include long development lead times for mines, regulatory hurdles, and potential shifts in public acceptance of nuclear power. These elements create a backdrop where both broad and junior-focused ETFs respond differently to sustained demand growth versus short-term price volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, NLR has exhibited relatively moderated volatility due to its inclusion of stable utility operators alongside miners, allowing participation in nuclear demand trends with some cushion from downstream revenues. URNJ has shown greater sensitivity to uranium spot price fluctuations and exploration news, leading to sharper moves during commodity rallies or corrections. Sector rotation favoring clean energy has supported both, yet earnings cycles of larger holdings in NLR have provided steadier contributions, while URNJ’s smaller issuers respond more acutely to financing and permitting developments. Interest rate expectations and broader commodity trends have influenced relative positioning, with NLR demonstrating resilience in mixed environments and URNJ offering higher-beta exposure to uranium momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing thematic ETFs like NLR and URNJ may find the tool useful for refining criteria around sector exposure and volatility profiles.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probability of favor to NLR in the current environment. Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the nuclear value chain, and inclusion of utility operators support more consistent sector momentum capture with moderated risk exposure. URNJ offers compelling upside potential through concentrated junior miner positioning but carries elevated cost and volatility considerations that may temper preference under probabilistic evaluation of trend consistency and risk-adjusted characteristics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. URNJ commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a StrongBuy and URNJ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 4.09B vs. URNJ (376M). URNJ has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: URNJ (2.738) vs NLR (-4.034). NLR was incepted earlier than URNJ: NLR (19 years) vs URNJ (4 years). NLR (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than URNJ (0.80). NLR has a higher turnover URNJ (38.00) vs URNJ (38.00).
NLRURNJNLR / URNJ
Gain YTD-4.0342.738-147%
Net Assets4.09B376M1,089%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.8065%
Turnover42.0038.00111%
Yield2.676.4142%
Fund Existence19 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRURNJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URNJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWGFX16.630.19
+1.16%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc F-1
CVACX19.380.20
+1.04%
Calamos Select Fund C
ACESX11.98N/A
N/A
Invesco Equity and Income R
STNFX46.40N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Growth Inst
BRSJX17.44N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq I