NOV
Price
$20.96
Change
-$0.21 (-0.99%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
7.52B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TS
Price
$60.84
Change
-$1.24 (-2.00%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
31.04B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NOV vs TS

Header iconNOV vs TS Comparison
Open Charts NOV vs TSBanner chart's image
NOV vs TS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? NOV Inc. (NOV) vs. Tenaris S.A. (TS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • TS has significantly outperformed NOV year-to-date, with gains of approximately 64% compared to NOV's 28%.
  • Tenaris S.A. boasts a stronger balance sheet, with debt-to-equity ratio (a measure of financial leverage) at 2.67% versus NOV's 37.32%.
  • TS trades at a more attractive trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 17.4 compared to NOV's 79.4.
  • Return on equity (ROE, a profitability metric) stands at 11.73% for TS, far exceeding NOV's 1.52%.
  • Recent earnings for NOV showed revenue beats but EPS misses amid Middle East pressures, while TS delivered solid results with positive analyst upgrades.
  • Both stocks benefit from energy sector tailwinds, but TS exhibits greater momentum in recent market activity.

Introduction

In the volatile energy sector, investors and traders often compare stocks like NOV Inc. and Tenaris S.A. (TS) due to their roles in oilfield equipment and tubular goods. This stock comparison highlights relative performance, financial health, and market positioning amid fluctuating oil prices and geopolitical influences. Energy-focused portfolios, swing traders eyeing momentum, and long-term investors assessing sector exposure will find value in understanding how these companies stack up in the current market environment, aiding informed relative performance decisions.

NOV Overview and Recent Performance

NOV Inc., formerly National Oilwell Varco, designs, manufactures, and sells equipment and components for oil and gas drilling, production, and renewable energy applications. Headquartered in Houston, it operates in Energy Equipment and Energy Products and Services segments, serving global upstream markets.

In recent market activity, NOV shares have shown resilience with year-to-date gains around 28%, though facing pullbacks after Q1 2026 earnings reported revenue of $2.05 billion (beating estimates) but earnings per share (EPS) of $0.05 (missing forecasts). Sentiment has been influenced by Middle East disruptions pressuring margins, offset by a robust backlog and offshore momentum from prior quarters. Trading near $19.86 with a market cap of $7.13 billion, the stock reflects broader energy recovery but higher valuation multiples amid these headwinds.

TS Overview and Recent Performance

Tenaris S.A. (TS) is a leading global producer of steel pipes, including casings, tubing, and line pipes, primarily for the energy industry, with operations worldwide and headquarters in Luxembourg. It provides related services like premium joints and coatings, benefiting from oil and gas exploration demand.

Recent weeks have seen TS deliver strong momentum, up about 64% year-to-date and trading around $63.70 with a $32.21 billion market cap. Q4 2025 results featured $3 billion in revenue and EPS beats, supporting upgrades like Barclays' Overweight rating. Positive drivers include rising oil prices and efficient operations, though challenges like potential tariffs on imports have emerged. Overall, robust profitability and low leverage have bolstered investor sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 available, selected by AI algorithms as most suitable for current market conditions like volatility in tech, energy, and growth sectors. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, showcasing diverse strategies: trend-following, swing trading, volatility plays, and multi-agent systems. Stats highlight impressive ranges, with annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51%–88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and Sharpe ratios emphasizing risk-adjusted gains. Timeframes vary from 5-minute scalps to multi-day holds, covering themes like semiconductors, data centers, and industrials. Traders can explore these for copy trading insights tailored to today's environment—visit the page to discover bots matching your style.

Head-to-Head Comparison

NOV and TS both serve the upstream energy sector but differ in business models: NOV focuses on diversified drilling equipment and digital solutions, while TS specializes in high-margin steel tubulars with global manufacturing scale. Growth drivers include oil demand recovery for both, though TS benefits more from pipe pricing power and low-cost production.

Recent momentum favors TS with superior YTD returns and monthly gains around 9% versus NOV's 5%, reflecting TS's earnings consistency. Risk factors contrast sharply—NOV's higher debt and margin pressures from regional conflicts heighten volatility, while TS's minimal leverage and strong cash flows provide stability, despite trade tariff risks. Sector exposure is similar (oilfield services), but TS shows better market sentiment via lower P/E and analyst targets implying upside.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward TS over NOV, based on trend consistency, superior ROE (11.73% vs. 1.52%), attractive forward P/E near 18, explosive YTD momentum, and lower risk profile from minimal debt. NOV offers diversification into renewables but trails in stability and catalysts amid recent earnings pressures. This positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance for TS in prevailing energy trends, though both warrant monitoring for oil price shifts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
NOV vs. TS commentary
May 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOV is a Buy and TS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2026
Stock price -- (NOV: $20.96 vs. TS: $60.84)
Brand notoriety: NOV and TS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOV: 67% vs. TS: 175%
Market capitalization -- NOV: $7.52B vs. TS: $31.04B
NOV [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $7.52B. TS’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $31.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $84.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $4.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NOV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TS is a better buy in the long-term than NOV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOV is a better buy in the short-term than TS.

Price Growth

NOV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while TS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +73.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOV is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

TS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.53% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TS($31B) has a higher market cap than NOV($7.52B). NOV has higher P/E ratio than TS: NOV (83.84) vs TS (16.01). TS YTD gains are higher at: 61.350 vs. NOV (34.749). TS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.21B vs. NOV (735M). NOV has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. TS (142M). TS has less debt than NOV: TS (449M) vs NOV (2.34B). TS has higher revenues than NOV: TS (12.2B) vs NOV (8.69B).
NOVTSNOV / TS
Capitalization7.52B31B24%
EBITDA735M3.21B23%
Gain YTD34.74961.35057%
P/E Ratio83.8416.01524%
Revenue8.69B12.2B71%
Total Cash1.34B142M945%
Total Debt2.34B449M521%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOV vs TS: Fundamental Ratings
NOV
TS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
586
SMR RATING
1..100
8965
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TS's Valuation (33) in the Steel industry is in the same range as NOV (54) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

TS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOV (58) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.

TS's SMR Rating (65) in the Steel industry is in the same range as NOV (89) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

TS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Steel industry is in the same range as NOV (40) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

NOV's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TS (16) in the Steel industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to TS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NOV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MENS2.180.23
+11.79%
Jyong Biotech Ltd
CTMX3.650.15
+4.43%
CytomX Therapeutics
KNTK50.800.21
+0.42%
Kinetik Holdings
KAPA0.48N/A
-0.42%
Kairos Pharma Ltd.
CQP63.75-0.58
-0.90%
Cheniere Energy Partners LP

NOV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOV has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOV jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOV
1D Price
Change %
NOV100%
-0.99%
SLB - NOV
70%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
HAL - NOV
69%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
BKR - NOV
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
WFRD - NOV
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
WHD - NOV
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
More

TS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TS has been loosely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TS jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TS
1D Price
Change %
TS100%
-0.07%
SLB - TS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
OII - TS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
TTI - TS
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
NOV - TS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
HLX - TS
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
More