Advertisement
NPB vs RBKB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPB is a Hold and RBKB is a Hold.
RBKB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NPB | RBKB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 50% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NPB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RBKB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RBKB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NPB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBKB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NPB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RBKB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
NPB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.26% price change this week, while RBKB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
NPB is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
NPB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPB has been loosely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPB jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPB | 100% | +1.92% | ||
| IBCP - NPB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| EFSC - NPB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| FFBC - NPB | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| NBHC - NPB | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| AMAL - NPB | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||
RBKB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBKB has been loosely correlated with MCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBKB jumps, then MCB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBKB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBKB | 100% | +1.81% | ||
| MCB - RBKB | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| NPB - RBKB | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| ONBPO - RBKB | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| FDBC - RBKB | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FRMEP - RBKB | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||