OIH
Price
$414.70
Change
-$24.27 (-5.53%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
2.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VDE
Price
$162.36
Change
-$3.50 (-2.11%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
11.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OIH vs VDE

Header iconOIH vs VDE Comparison
Open Charts OIH vs VDEBanner chart's image
OIH vs VDE Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) vs. Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE)

Key Takeaways

  • OIH offers concentrated exposure to 25 oil services companies, emphasizing equipment, services, and drilling, while VDE provides broader diversification across 106 energy firms including integrated oil majors and midstream.
  • OIH's expense ratio of 0.35% is higher than VDE's ultra-low 0.09%, favoring VDE for cost-conscious long-term investors.
  • Top holdings differ markedly: OIH led by SLB (~20%), BKR (~12%), and HAL (~7%); VDE dominated by XOM (~23%) and CVX (~15%).
  • OIH exhibits higher volatility and concentration risk (top 10 ~70-72% of assets) tied to upstream activity, contrasting VDE's more stable profile with lower beta and turnover around 11%.
  • Both are passive index trackers, but OIH focuses on cyclical oilfield services with quarterly rebalancing, while VDE spans the full energy value chain with quarterly adjustments.
  • In recent market cycles, OIH has shown amplified upside during drilling booms but greater drawdowns compared to VDE's steadier sector representation.

Introduction

Investors seeking energy sector exposure often weigh targeted strategies against broad diversification. The OIH and VDE ETFs represent alternative approaches within this volatile space. OIH delivers precise access to oil services, benefiting from upstream capital spending cycles, while VDE captures the entire U.S. energy ecosystem, including stable integrated producers and midstream infrastructure. These funds appeal to those positioning for commodity trends, geopolitical shifts, and sector rotation amid ongoing demand for oil and gas. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in risk, cost, and sensitivity to oilfield activity versus overall energy health, aiding decisions in today's dynamic market environment.

VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) Overview

The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) is a passive fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, which focuses on the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-listed companies providing oil equipment, services, and drilling to the upstream oil sector. It holds approximately 25 stocks, with the top 10 comprising over 70% of assets, including SLB (Schlumberger, ~20%), BKR (Baker Hughes, ~12%), HAL (Halliburton, ~7%), FTI (TechnipFMC, ~6%), and TS (Tenaris, ~5%). The portfolio is nearly 100% allocated to energy, specifically oil services subsector.

Its expense ratio is 0.35%, and the modified market-cap weighted index caps individual holdings at 20%, with semi-annual reviews and quarterly rebalancing on the third Friday of March, June, September, and December. This structure emphasizes liquidity and concentration, suiting investors bullish on drilling and rig activity, though it amplifies volatility from cyclical upstream exposure.

Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) Overview

The Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) passively tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. energy stocks across the value chain as defined by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It holds 106 securities, with top 10 at ~64%, led by XOM (Exxon Mobil, ~23%), CVX (Chevron, ~15%), COP (ConocoPhillips, ~6%), WMB (Williams Companies, ~3%), and EOG (EOG Resources, ~3%).

Sector breakdown includes integrated oil & gas (39.5%), exploration & production (23.1%), storage & transportation (14.4%), equipment & services (10.5%), refining & marketing (10.2%), drilling (1.4%), and coal (0.8%). The expense ratio is a low 0.09%, with market-cap weighting under 25/50 rules for diversification, quarterly rebalancing, and turnover of ~11%. This non-diversified yet broad setup offers balanced energy exposure with lower concentration risk.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The energy sector navigates robust global demand amid geopolitical tensions, supply constraints, and energy transition pressures. Oil services (OIH's focus) hinge on upstream capex, buoyed by offshore projects, potential Venezuela reopening, Saudi activity recovery, and power generation for data centers. Broader energy (VDE) benefits from integrated majors' refining margins, midstream stability, and natural gas trends. Macro drivers like elevated crude prices from tensions, volatile nat gas due to weather, and OPEC+ dynamics support flows, though regulatory shifts and softening demand growth pose risks. Capital rotates into energy for inflation hedging, with sector risks tied to commodity cycles and geopolitical developments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, OIH has demonstrated higher upside during oil price rallies and increased drilling, outperforming VDE by leveraging services firms' sensitivity to rig counts and capex. For instance, year-to-date through early May 2026, OIH gained around 48%, outpacing VDE's ~27%, reflecting oil services' beta to commodity surges. VDE's positioning, anchored by integrated giants, shows lower volatility and steadier returns linked to refining, pipelines, and exploration cycles. OIH's concentrated profile amplifies sector rotations into cyclicals, while VDE captures broader trends like midstream resilience, exhibiting reduced drawdowns in choppy markets. Relative volatility favors VDE for stability, with OIH suiting tactical plays on upstream momentum amid interest rate expectations and geopolitical factors.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across sectors like energy. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in ETF comparisons and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VDE for its superior cost efficiency (0.09% expense ratio), broader diversification (106 holdings), and lower volatility profile, enhancing risk-adjusted positioning amid uncertain energy cycles. While OIH offers leveraged upside to oil services momentum, VDE's structural strength across the energy chain provides more consistent trend capture and sector momentum resilience, with ~70% probability of relative outperformance over multi-month horizons based on diversification and expense advantages.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
OIH vs. VDE commentary
Jun 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OIH is a Hold and VDE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VDE has more net assets: 11.8B vs. OIH (2.37B). OIH has a higher annual dividend yield than VDE: OIH (45.626) vs VDE (29.681). OIH was incepted earlier than VDE: OIH (14 years) vs VDE (22 years). VDE (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than OIH (0.35). OIH has a higher turnover VDE (11.00) vs VDE (11.00).
OIHVDEOIH / VDE
Gain YTD45.62629.681154%
Net Assets2.37B11.8B20%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.09389%
Turnover21.0011.00191%
Yield1.162.4747%
Fund Existence14 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OIHVDE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OIH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPR29.37-0.15
-0.51%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2028
DLAG32.76-0.21
-0.63%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Dl Drctl Buf ETF - Aug
PTMC40.07-0.78
-1.91%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Mid Cap ETF
SPXX18.07-0.36
-1.95%
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
ABFL81.37-2.62
-3.12%
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF

OIH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OIH has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OIH jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OIH
1D Price
Change %
OIH100%
-5.53%
SLB - OIH
86%
Closely correlated
-5.41%
NOV - OIH
83%
Closely correlated
-6.11%
HAL - OIH
82%
Closely correlated
-4.95%
BKR - OIH
79%
Closely correlated
-5.32%
HP - OIH
78%
Closely correlated
-5.40%
More

VDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VDE has been closely correlated with XOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VDE jumps, then XOM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VDE
1D Price
Change %
VDE100%
-2.11%
XOM - VDE
89%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
COP - VDE
89%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
CVX - VDE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
EOG - VDE
86%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
MGY - VDE
85%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
More