ONB
Price
$18.68
Change
+$0.37 (+2.02%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.1B
10 days until earnings call
USB
Price
$37.86
Change
+$0.61 (+1.64%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
68.49B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ONB vs USB

Header iconONB vs USB Comparison
Open Charts ONB vs USBBanner chart's image
Old National Ban
Price$18.68
Change+$0.37 (+2.02%)
Volume$3.27M
Capitalization5.1B
US Ban
Price$37.86
Change+$0.61 (+1.64%)
Volume$18.56M
Capitalization68.49B
ONB vs USB Comparison Chart
Loading...
ONB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONB vs. USB commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONB is a Hold and USB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (ONB: $18.68 vs. USB: $37.86)
Brand notoriety: ONB: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONB: 114% vs. USB: 149%
Market capitalization -- ONB: $5.1B vs. USB: $68.49B
ONB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.1B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONB is a better buy in the long-term than USB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ONB and USB are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ONB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.95% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

USB is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($68.5B) has a higher market cap than ONB($5.1B). USB has higher P/E ratio than ONB: USB (13.44) vs ONB (8.58). ONB YTD gains are higher at: -13.395 vs. USB (-19.897). ONB has less debt than USB: ONB (5.05B) vs USB (62.9B). USB has higher revenues than ONB: USB (28B) vs ONB (1.84B).
ONBUSBONB / USB
Capitalization5.1B68.5B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.395-19.89767%
P/E Ratio8.5813.4464%
Revenue1.84B28B7%
Total Cash431MN/A-
Total Debt5.05B62.9B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONB vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
ONB
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7482
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3863
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1468
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USB's Valuation (59) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (68) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew somewhat faster than USB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONBUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ONB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RVYL0.950.07
+7.98%
Ryvyl
CANG3.570.16
+4.69%
Cango
STE221.093.97
+1.83%
STERIS plc
SLG49.630.39
+0.79%
SL Green Realty Corp
LUNR7.72-0.12
-1.53%
Intuitive Machines

ONB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONB
1D Price
Change %
ONB100%
+2.02%
FNB - ONB
92%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
PNFP - ONB
91%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
HWC - ONB
91%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
FIBK - ONB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
ABCB - ONB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More