Advertisement
OPAL vs STN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPAL is a Hold and STN is a Hold.
STN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| OPAL | STN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 40% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OPAL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while STN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OPAL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OPAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OPAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
OPAL (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -5.95% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
OPAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
STN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.07% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MTYY | 17.48 | 0.20 | +1.15% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF (MTYY) | |||
| OASC | 34.25 | 0.36 | +1.06% |
| OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) | |||
| FBUF | 33.41 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) | |||
| HPF | 13.46 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II | |||
| LRGC | 85.85 | -0.07 | -0.08% |
| AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) | |||
OPAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OPAL and BWMN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPAL and BWMN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPAL | 100% | N/A | ||
| BWMN - OPAL | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| J - OPAL | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.34% | ||
| AMRC - OPAL | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| STN - OPAL | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| IESC - OPAL | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
More | ||||
STN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then J could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| J - STN | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| ACM - STN | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| TTEK - STN | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| PRIM - STN | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| KBR - STN | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||