Advertisement
PANW vs QLYS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a StrongBuy and QLYS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QLYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -9.37% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
PANW is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
QLYS is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.34% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| PANW | QLYS | PANW / QLYS | |
| Capitalization | 128B | 5.04B | 2,541% |
| EBITDA | 1.94B | 214M | 907% |
| Gain YTD | 1.061 | 0.175 | 607% |
| P/E Ratio | 116.39 | 27.22 | 428% |
| Revenue | 9.22B | 637M | 1,448% |
| Total Cash | 2.9B | 370M | 785% |
| Total Debt | 338M | 55.3M | 611% |
PANW | QLYS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QLYS's Valuation (81) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (88) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QLYS (64) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's SMR Rating (23) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (48) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
QLYS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (62) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QLYS (67) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than QLYS’s over the last 12 months.
| PANW | QLYS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 15 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MMSC | 23.37 | 0.73 | +3.22% |
| First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF | |||
| MTUM | 242.30 | 4.47 | +1.88% |
| iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |||
| BHK | 9.56 | 0.08 | +0.84% |
| Blackrock Core BD TR | |||
| FTCE | 24.20 | 0.18 | +0.74% |
| First Trust New Cstrcts Cr Erns Ldrs ETF | |||
| SPE | 14.97 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| Special Opportunities Fund | |||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 72% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 70% Closely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
QLYS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLYS | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| TDC - QLYS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| TENB - QLYS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| DJCO - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | +7.56% | ||
| PCTY - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ADSK - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||