PBD
Price
$18.04
Change
-$0.03 (-0.17%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
190.34M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ROBO
Price
$81.17
Change
+$0.23 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
2.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBD vs ROBO

PBD vs ROBO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) vs. ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) targets global clean energy innovation through a passive index-tracking strategy, while ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) focuses on robotics, automation, and artificial intelligence (AI) companies.
  • PBD maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.75% compared to ROBO's 0.95%, offering a modest cost advantage for long-term thematic exposure.
  • PBD holds approximately 111 securities with broad diversification across clean energy subsectors, whereas ROBO holds about 80 holdings concentrated in robotics and automation themes.
  • Both ETFs employ passive, rules-based indexing with periodic rebalancing, but they address distinct megatrends: energy transition for PBD and technological automation for ROBO.
  • PBD provides exposure to a wider range of international markets in renewable technologies, while ROBO emphasizes global leaders in intelligent systems and industrial applications.
  • Structural differences position PBD as a cleaner-energy play and ROBO as an automation and AI enabler, resulting in differentiated risk profiles tied to policy support versus technological adoption cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking thematic growth often compare specialized ETFs that capture transformative trends such as decarbonization and automation. Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) do not compete directly but offer alternative routes to innovation-driven sectors. PBD emphasizes clean energy infrastructure and technologies, while ROBO targets robotics and AI-enabled systems. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions, helping investors align exposure with specific megatrend convictions rather than broad market benchmarks.

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) Overview

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. The index selects companies involved in clean energy innovation, including renewables, energy efficiency, and related technologies. As of recent data, the fund holds approximately 111 securities with a focus on equal-weighted tiers to promote diversification. Top holdings typically include firms in solar, wind, and battery storage, though concentration in the top 10 remains modest at around 13%. Sector allocations center on industrials, information technology, and utilities tied to clean energy themes. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. The ETF uses a full replication approach with regular rebalancing to maintain index alignment. It is listed on NYSE Arca and provides liquid access to global clean energy innovators.

ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) Overview

ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) is a passively managed fund designed to track the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. The index selects companies engaged in robotics, automation, and artificial intelligence applications across industrial, healthcare, and consumer sectors. The fund typically holds about 80 securities, emphasizing global diversification with limits on single-country exposure. Holdings focus on technology enablers and end-users of automation solutions. Sector allocations lean heavily toward information technology and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.95%. ROBO employs a modified equal-weight methodology with periodic rebalancing to reflect evolving robotics and automation themes. It trades on NYSE and offers exposure to firms developing intelligent systems and automated processes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The clean energy and robotics automation sectors operate within broader macroeconomic and policy environments. Clean energy benefits from government incentives, renewable portfolio standards, and corporate sustainability commitments, though it faces risks from commodity price volatility and regulatory shifts. Robotics and automation gain from labor shortages, manufacturing reshoring, and advances in machine learning, supported by capital spending in technology and industrial sectors. Both themes intersect with artificial intelligence adoption and supply-chain resilience, yet they respond differently to interest rate cycles and geopolitical tensions affecting energy markets versus technology supply chains. Capital flows into these areas reflect long-term structural demand rather than short-term fluctuations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has shown sensitivity to energy policy developments and commodity trends, with volatility influenced by shifts in renewable project financing. ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) has exhibited behavior tied to technology earnings cycles and automation adoption rates, often displaying resilience during periods of corporate capital expenditure growth. Relative positioning reveals PBD's greater exposure to policy-driven catalysts, while ROBO benefits from secular demand for efficiency gains. Both funds demonstrate thematic volatility distinct from broad equity indices, with differences arising from sector rotation between energy transition investments and technology infrastructure spending.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Access the AI Screener to explore additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) due to its lower expense ratio, broader holdings count, and diversified exposure within a policy-supported megatrend. ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO) offers compelling differentiation in automation themes but carries a higher cost structure. The assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving sector momentum and macroeconomic conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PBD vs. ROBO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBD is a StrongBuy and ROBO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ROBO has more net assets: 2.07B vs. PBD (190M). ROBO has a higher annual dividend yield than PBD: ROBO (17.112) vs PBD (12.733). PBD was incepted earlier than ROBO: PBD (19 years) vs ROBO (13 years). PBD (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than ROBO (0.95). PBD has a higher turnover ROBO (35.00) vs ROBO (35.00).
PBDROBOPBD / ROBO
Gain YTD12.73317.11274%
Net Assets190M2.07B9%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.9579%
Turnover49.0035.00140%
Yield1.750.37478%
Fund Existence19 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBDROBO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ROBO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCMGX37.760.97
+2.64%
OCM Gold Investor
GCIGX21.880.25
+1.16%
Gabelli International Growth C
VGINX105.990.49
+0.46%
JPMorgan US Value R6
JMVCX16.76N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value C
TOLSX15.95-0.18
-1.12%
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S

PBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been closely correlated with AMRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then AMRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBD
1D Price
Change %
PBD100%
-0.17%
AMRC - PBD
66%
Closely correlated
-3.65%
MP - PBD
60%
Loosely correlated
+9.10%
BE - PBD
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
CHPT - PBD
58%
Loosely correlated
+7.94%
ACHR - PBD
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
More