Advertisement
PENG vs UCTT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PENG is a Hold and UCTT is a Hold.
PENG in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on September 25, 2026
PENG moved above its 50-day moving average on September 25, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 27 of 32 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 16, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PENG as a result. In 57 of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The 10-day moving average for PENG crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 29, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +10.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PENG advanced for three days, in 238 of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 224 of 280 cases where PENG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 80%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for PENG moved out of overbought territory on October 14, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 23 of the 28 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 82%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PENG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
PENG broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PENG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 64 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.418) is normal, around the industry mean (7.462). P/E Ratio (39.540) is within average values for comparable stocks, (67.645). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.380) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.751) is also within normal values, averaging (141.758).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PENG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
Momentum Indicator for UCTT turns negative, indicating new downward trend
UCTT saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 06, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 95 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 80 of the 95 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for UCTT turned negative on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 73%.
UCTT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for UCTT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where UCTT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +3.83% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where UCTT advanced for three days, in 230 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
UCTT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 226 of 263 cases where UCTT Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 86%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 52 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.525) is normal, around the industry mean (8.078). P/E Ratio (39.887) is within average values for comparable stocks, (161.623). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.353) is also within normal values, averaging (0.801). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.002) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.374) is also within normal values, averaging (27.897).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. UCTT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. UCTT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PENG | UCTT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UCTT's Valuation (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as PENG (64) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that UCTT’s stock grew similarly to PENG’s over the last 12 months.
PENG's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as UCTT (91) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that PENG’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
PENG's SMR Rating (57) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCTT (92) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that PENG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
PENG's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as UCTT (60) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that PENG’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
PENG's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as UCTT (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that PENG’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
| PENG | UCTT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PENG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while UCTT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PENG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UCTT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PENG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCTT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PENG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UCTT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PENG (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -6.91% price change this week, while UCTT (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -20.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -15.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
PENG is expected to report earnings on Jan 05, 2027.
UCTT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-1.26% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
@Electronic Production Equipment (-15.43% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ZSB | 20.59 | N/A | N/A |
| USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) | |||
| UDN | 17.70 | -0.06 | -0.34% |
| Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN) | |||
| BUFG | 30.10 | -0.19 | -0.64% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) | |||
| QNXT | 30.68 | -0.40 | -1.30% |
| iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) | |||
| XHB | 92.84 | -1.79 | -1.89% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) | |||
UCTT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCTT has been closely correlated with ICHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCTT jumps, then ICHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCTT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCTT | 100% | -6.93% | ||
| ICHR - UCTT | 80% Closely correlated | -7.19% | ||
| ONTO - UCTT | 79% Closely correlated | -8.40% | ||
| COHU - UCTT | 77% Closely correlated | -7.25% | ||
| AMAT - UCTT | 77% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| LRCX - UCTT | 76% Closely correlated | -4.71% | ||
More | ||||