Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Timken (TKR) are key players in the industrials sector, specializing in motion control and engineered bearings, respectively. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid ongoing sector rotation and economic shifts. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye relative strength, while long-term investors could weigh diversification, earnings stability, and dividend profiles. With industrials benefiting from infrastructure demand and manufacturing recovery, understanding their contrasts aids informed stock comparison decisions in the current environment.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH), a Fortune 250 leader in motion and control technologies, operates in diversified industrial and aerospace systems. Its portfolio includes hydraulics, pneumatics, filtration, and electromechanical components serving aerospace, transportation, and energy markets worldwide.
In recent market activity, PH reported record fiscal Q3 2026 sales of $5.49 billion and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $8.17, surpassing estimates despite trimming some guidance due to softness in automotive and regional demand. The stock, trading around $873 with a market cap over $110 billion, has pulled back from February highs near $1,035 amid broader industrials rotation and post-earnings reactions. Sentiment remains supported by raised FY2026 EPS outlook to $31.20, robust aerospace backlogs, and 69 years of consecutive dividend increases, though YTD returns lag at 0.5% versus stronger one-year gains of 43%.
The Timken Company (TKR) designs and manufactures engineered bearings and industrial motion products, including tapered roller bearings and power transmission components. It serves sectors like aerospace, automotive, rail, mining, and wind energy through Engineered Bearings and Industrial Motion segments.
Recent weeks have seen TKR stock, around $110 with a $7.65 billion market cap, exhibit strong momentum, up over 10% in the past month and 30% YTD, outperforming peers amid industrials strength. Q4 2025 EPS of $1.14 beat estimates, with revenue at $1.11 billion, supporting ongoing portfolio simplification and 8% EPS growth targets. Influences include analyst upgrades on industrial cycle inflection and steady dividend of $1.40 annually. One-year returns exceed 65%, though shares approach 52-week highs near $112, reflecting positive sentiment from demand in construction and renewables.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-powered trading bots for copy trading in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots—scanning thousands of tickers with diverse styles like trend-following, multi-agent strategies, and timeframes from 5 minutes to daily—only 25 elite bots out of 351 total make this curated list. These are selected by AI analysis for suitability in current volatile conditions, boasting annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51%–88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Sectors span semiconductors, industrials (including PH), leveraged ETFs, and energy. Explore these high-potential bots to enhance your trading edge.
Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Timken (TKR) share industrials exposure but differ in scale and focus: PH's broad motion control platform drives stability via aerospace (strong backlogs) and diversification, contrasting TKR's bearings niche with heavier reliance on cyclical auto, mining, and rail.
Growth drivers for PH include M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and organic expansion (raised to 5.5%), while TKR emphasizes 80/20 portfolio optimization. Recent momentum favors TKR (10%+ monthly gains), but PH offers superior long-term returns and cash flow. Risk factors: PH faces automotive softness; TKR higher beta (1.18) amplifies volatility. Market sentiment tilts toward TKR's upgrades, yet PH's size buffers downturns, presenting trade-offs in stability versus upside potential.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward Timken (TKR) based on superior recent momentum, YTD outperformance, and industrials rotation trends, with bots featuring TKR-adjacent plays showing strong signals. PH’s trend consistency and catalysts like aerospace provide stability, but TKR’s relative positioning suggests higher probability of near-term gains in probabilistic terms.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTKR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PH (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while TKR (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -6.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.87%.
PH is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
TKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-2.16% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| PH | TKR | PH / TKR | |
| Capitalization | 107B | 7.6B | 1,408% |
| EBITDA | 5.63B | 783M | 719% |
| Gain YTD | -2.603 | 30.830 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.46 | 24.85 | 127% |
| Revenue | 21B | 4.67B | 449% |
| Total Cash | 476M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 9.58B | 2.06B | 466% |
PH | TKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TKR's Valuation (79) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PH (87) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TKR’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TKR (50) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TKR’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TKR (70) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to TKR’s over the last 12 months.
TKR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PH (60) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TKR’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
TKR's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PH (28) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TKR’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
| PH | TKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 15 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.