Advertisement
PINS vs Z
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) vs. Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PINS demonstrates stronger profitability margins at nearly 10%, with a trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 32.87, contrasting Z's elevated 493.33 due to thin EPS (earnings per share).
- Z leads year-to-date (YTD) performance at +34.92%, outpacing PINS's +22.56%, amid broader tech resilience.
- Analyst price targets imply 62% upside for Z to $72, versus 16% for PINS to $23, reflecting Zillow's housing recovery potential.
- PINS benefits from AI-driven ad innovations, while Z navigates mortgage rate volatility impacting real estate sentiment.
- Tickeron's comparison tool views PINS as the stronger long-term buy over Z based on relative valuation and growth.
Introduction
Pinterest (PINS) and Zillow Group (Z) represent distinct corners of the consumer internet space: visual discovery and advertising versus real estate marketplaces. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance drivers, and investor sentiment amid tech sector rotations and economic shifts. Growth-oriented traders and long-term investors tracking digital platforms may find value in evaluating relative momentum, valuation trade-offs, and sector-specific catalysts in the current environment.
PINS Overview and Recent Performance
Pinterest operates a visual discovery platform where users save and share ideas, primarily monetized through advertising. In recent market activity, PINS shares have traded around $20, reflecting a year-to-date gain of 22.56% but remaining well below the 52-week high of $39.93. Sentiment has been shaped by upcoming Q1 2026 earnings expectations of $0.22 EPS and $964 million in revenue, alongside investments in AI shopping features and connected TV (CTV) ads. However, cautious analyst views on ad pricing and monetization challenges following strong Q4 2025 results have tempered enthusiasm, contributing to price consolidation in recent weeks.
Z Overview and Recent Performance
Zillow Group runs an online real estate platform offering listings, rentals, and mortgage tools. Recently, Z closed near $44.40, delivering robust YTD returns of 34.92% despite a 52-week high of $93.88, buoyed by analyst projections for significant upside. Performance reflects uneven lead-distribution results and broader housing market pressures from rising mortgage rates tied to inflation concerns. Recent weeks have seen modest gains amid volatile interest rates, with sentiment influenced by expectations of slower but persistent home price growth into 2026.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors like semiconductors, small caps, and gold miners. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, boasting annualized returns from +23% to +164%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors above 1.5 for leaders. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents with 60-minute trades yielding 68-98% returns and small-cap trend traders at 94% with 59% win rates. Explore these high-performing, market-adapted bots tailored to current conditions for potential portfolio enhancement.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PINS and Z diverge in business models: Pinterest's ad-driven ecosystem versus Zillow's transaction-facilitated real estate services. Growth drivers for PINS include 14% quarterly revenue growth and AI enhancements, yielding 9.87% profit margins and a forward P/E of 11.44 (PEG ratio (price/earnings-to-growth) of 0.33), signaling attractive valuation. Z contends with cyclical housing exposure, thinner margins, and sensitivity to rates, though its platform scale supports lead generation.
Recent momentum favors Z's YTD edge, but PINS offers stability with positive ROE (return on equity) of 8.78%. Risk factors include ad competition for PINS and macroeconomic housing slowdowns for Z. Market sentiment leans toward Z's higher targets, yet PINS's lower multiples highlight a relative value play in consumer tech positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PINS over Z for its superior long-term buy rating, driven by consistent trend stability, favorable forward valuation metrics like a 11.44 P/E and 0.33 PEG, and resilient profitability amid ad market evolution. While Z shows stronger short-term momentum and upside potential, PINS's lower risk profile and growth efficiency position it probabilistically better in varied market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PINS is a StrongBuy and Z is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- Z’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while Z’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- Z’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PINS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -8.58% price change this week, while Z (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -6.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Z is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-1.19% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| PINS | Z | PINS / Z | |
| Capitalization | 10.9B | 6.94B | 157% |
| EBITDA | 350M | 354M | 99% |
| Gain YTD | -24.681 | -55.585 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.63 | 121.20 | 34% |
| Revenue | 4.37B | 2.69B | 162% |
| Total Cash | 1.3B | 783M | 166% |
| Total Debt | 1.21B | 429M | 281% |
PINS | Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINS's Valuation (66) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as Z (82) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as Z (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's SMR Rating (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as Z (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as Z (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for Z (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew significantly faster than Z’s over the last 12 months.
| PINS | Z | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
PINS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINS | 100% | -3.80% | ||
| CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| THRY - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| DASH - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| Z - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| YELP - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||
Z and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Z has been closely correlated with ZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if Z jumps, then ZG could also see price increases.