Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
POWR vs UTF
POWR vs UTF Comparison
Open Charts POWR vs UTF
POWR vs UTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
POWR vs. UTF commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is POWR is a Hold and UTF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UTF has more net assets: 2.97B vs. POWR (441M). UTF has a higher annual dividend yield than POWR: UTF (8.310) vs POWR (6.062). POWR was incepted earlier than UTF: POWR (15 years) vs UTF (22 years). POWR (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than UTF (2.29). POWR has a higher turnover UTF (21.00) vs UTF (21.00).
| POWR | UTF | POWR / UTF | |
| Gain YTD | 6.062 | 8.310 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 441M | 2.97B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 2.29 | 17% |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 21.00 | 429% |
| Yield | 1.68 | 2.37 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| POWR | UTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 25 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XAPR | 38.49 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) | |||
| BPI | 23.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF | |||
| RDIV | 59.72 | -0.58 | -0.96% |
| Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) | |||
| HAP | 76.03 | -0.93 | -1.21% |
| VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) | |||
| OGIG | 49.32 | -0.64 | -1.28% |
| ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) | |||
POWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POWR has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POWR jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWR | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| ETN - POWR | 69% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| PWR - POWR | 68% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| NVT - POWR | 67% Closely correlated | +4.33% | ||
| GEV - POWR | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| HUBB - POWR | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
UTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UTF and AMT have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UTF and AMT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y