PRA
Price
$23.95
Change
+$0.04 (+0.17%)
Updated
Oct 13, 03:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.23B
24 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$30.39
Change
-$0.07 (-0.23%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
776.49M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRA vs UFCS

Header iconPRA vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts PRA vs UFCSBanner chart's image
ProAssurance
Price$23.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
Volume$847
Capitalization1.23B
United Fire Group
Price$30.39
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
Volume$176
Capitalization776.49M
PRA vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRA vs. UFCS commentary
Oct 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRA is a Hold and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2025
Stock price -- (PRA: $23.90 vs. UFCS: $30.46)
Brand notoriety: PRA and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRA: 100% vs. UFCS: 94%
Market capitalization -- PRA: $1.23B vs. UFCS: $776.49M
PRA [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.23B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $776.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $140.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PRA and UFCS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRA is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.53% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRA($1.23B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($776M). PRA has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: PRA (25.16) vs UFCS (8.68). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 50.220 vs. UFCS (8.848). PRA has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. UFCS (1.19B). UFCS has less debt than PRA: UFCS (117M) vs PRA (439M). UFCS has higher revenues than PRA: UFCS (1.32B) vs PRA (1.11B).
PRAUFCSPRA / UFCS
Capitalization1.23B776M158%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.2208.848568%
P/E Ratio25.168.68290%
Revenue1.11B1.32B84%
Total Cash3.96B1.19B334%
Total Debt439M117M375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRA vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
PRA
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5955
SMR RATING
1..100
9169
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2387
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (59) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (91) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (48) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (87) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRAUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBSDX52.95N/A
N/A
Franklin S&P 500 Index D
LADPX23.87N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
CZOVX29.87N/A
N/A
Zacks All-Cap Core Institutional
RWCEX14.47N/A
N/A
Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Ins
JGAQX37.65-0.79
-2.06%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R2

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
-0.29%
AXS - PRA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
UFCS - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
BOW - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
WTM - PRA
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
SAFT - PRA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-1.01%
SAFT - UFCS
72%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
CINF - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
L - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
AIZ - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
ORI - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More