PRLB
Price
$75.05
Change
-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WOR
Price
$56.21
Change
+$0.56 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.75B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRLB vs WOR

PRLB vs WOR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Proto Labs (PRLB) vs. Worthington Enterprises (WOR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Proto Labs (PRLB) is a digital manufacturing specialist riding accelerating demand in data centers, drones, aerospace, and robotics — posting record revenue of $533.1 million in fiscal 2025 and a Q1 2026 earnings beat.
  • Worthington Enterprises (WOR) is a diversified metal manufacturing company generating $1.4 billion in fiscal 2026 sales and record free cash flow of $170 million, supported by a 54-year dividend streak.
  • PRLB has delivered roughly 47% year-to-date price appreciation through mid-2026, far outpacing WOR's approximately 9% YTD gain, though PRLB trades at a significantly higher valuation multiple.
  • WOR offers a 1.4% dividend yield with a P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 17–18, while PRLB carries no dividend and a P/E ratio above 70, reflecting sharply different risk-return profiles.
  • Both companies are expanding into data center infrastructure, but through different angles: PRLB via advanced manufacturing services and WOR through liquid cooling tank production and building products acquisitions.
  • Analyst consensus rates both stocks as "Moderate Buy," yet PRLB shows stronger upward earnings revision momentum heading into its Q2 2026 report.

Introduction

Investors evaluating industrial-sector opportunities face a study in contrasts when comparing PRLB and WOR. Proto Labs operates at the intersection of software and manufacturing — a digital-first platform delivering custom prototypes and production parts with unmatched speed. Worthington Enterprises, meanwhile, represents traditional industrial strength: a 70-year-old metal fabrication powerhouse with deep roots in pressure vessels, building products, and consumer goods. This comparison matters for anyone weighing growth-oriented technology-enabled manufacturing against a diversified, cash-flow-rich industrial compounder. The two stocks differ meaningfully across valuation, momentum, sector exposure, and income generation — making a side-by-side analysis essential for informed capital allocation.

PRLB Overview and Recent Performance

PRLB, headquartered in Maple Plain, Minnesota, is the world's leading provider of digital manufacturing services. The company transforms 3D CAD designs into functional parts using additive manufacturing (3D printing), CNC machining (Computer Numerical Control machining), and injection molding — all through an automated, e-commerce-driven platform. Proto Labs serves product developers, engineers, and supply chain teams across industries including aerospace, medical devices, automotive, and consumer electronics. In recent market activity, PRLB has exhibited notable momentum. The company closed fiscal 2025 with record annual revenue of $533.1 million, a 6.4% year-over-year increase, and followed with an even stronger Q1 2026 — reporting $139.3 million in revenue that beat analyst estimates alongside EPS (earnings per share) of $0.54 versus the $0.36 consensus. CNC Machining revenue grew 25% year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2025, underscoring robust demand. Benchmark analysts raised their price target from $70 to $91, citing growth across data centers, drones, aerospace, satellites, renewable energy, and robotics. The stock has rallied approximately 47% year-to-date through mid-2026, trading in the mid-to-high $70s. Proto Labs was also named to TIME's 2026 list of America's Best Companies, reinforcing its reputation as an innovation leader.

WOR Overview and Recent Performance

WOR, based in Columbus, Ohio, is a diversified metal manufacturing company producing pressure vessels, engineered assemblies, and fabricated metal products. Its portfolio spans cylinders for compressed gases (propane, natural gas, and hydrogen), transport tanks, building products, and consumer goods — including well-known brands such as Balloon Time, BernzOmatic, and Amtrol. For fiscal 2026, which ended in May, Worthington Enterprises reported consolidated net sales of $1.4 billion, a 20% increase year-over-year, with 9% organic growth. Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) rose 12% to $296 million, and free cash flow reached a record $170 million — a 102% conversion rate relative to adjusted net earnings. The company recently raised its quarterly dividend by 5% to $0.20 per share, extending a 54-year streak of uninterrupted payments. However, Q4 2026 revenue of $371.5 million and EPS of $0.97 both missed consensus estimates, partly due to margin pressure in the cooling and construction businesses and a roughly $7 million decline in equity income from the ClarkDietrich joint venture. The stock has been under pressure in recent weeks, trading in the mid-$50s with a year-to-date gain of approximately 9%. Insider selling by a major shareholder and removal from the Russell 2000 Dynamic Index have added to near-term headwinds.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to navigate comparisons like this one with data-driven precision, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest adaptability to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span multiple trading styles, timeframes (from 5-minute to 60-minute signals), and strategic approaches — including single-stock agents, sector-focused multi-ticker portfolios, and innovative "Double Agents" that hedge long and inverse positions simultaneously. Recent performance data shows top bots achieving annualized returns exceeding 190%, with win rates above 65% and profit factors reaching 4.53 in some configurations. Each bot operates on Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs), which continuously ingest price action, volume data, and volatility signals to adapt their decision-making in real time. Whether you are a short-term momentum trader or a longer-horizon investor, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify algorithmically-driven opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

From a business model standpoint, these two companies occupy different positions on the industrial spectrum. PRLB is a technology-enabled service platform — its competitive moat lies in speed, automation, and digital workflow integration. WOR, by contrast, is a product-centric manufacturer deriving strength from brand longevity, distribution scale, and diversified end-market exposure across building products and consumer goods.

The growth narrative also diverges meaningfully. PRLB's recent acceleration has been powered by emerging innovation verticals — data center infrastructure, drones, satellites, and robotics — where rapid prototyping and short-run production are in high demand. The company's revenue per customer contact surged 23.2% year-over-year in Q4 2025. WOR is also tapping into data center growth, notably through ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) water tanks for liquid cooling systems, which generated approximately $13 million in shipments during fiscal 2026. However, WOR's broader portfolio remains tied to construction cycles, consumer discretionary spending, and commodity input costs — areas that have shown mixed signals in recent months.

Valuation represents the starkest contrast. PRLB trades at a P/E ratio above 70 and approximately 2.5 times trailing sales, reflecting growth expectations and a premium for its digital manufacturing model. WOR trades at a P/E of roughly 17–18 with a price-to-sales ratio near 2.2, accompanied by a 1.4% dividend yield. Risk factors differ accordingly: PRLB faces concentration risk in technology-driven manufacturing demand and elevated valuation sensitivity, while WOR contends with steel and aluminum input cost inflation, joint venture income volatility, and a recent deceleration in organic growth to 3% in Q4 2026.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor PRLB in the current environment. Proto Labs has demonstrated stronger recent price momentum, consistent upward earnings revisions, and exposure to high-growth secular themes — data centers, aerospace, and automation — that align with where institutional capital is currently flowing. The company's Piotroski Score of 9 indicates robust financial health, and five analysts have recently revised estimates higher. That said, the AI would also acknowledge WOR's strengths: a fortress balance sheet with sub-1.0x net debt to EBITDA, record free cash flow generation, and a 54-year dividend growth track record that appeals to income-oriented portfolios. The probabilistic assessment leans toward PRLB for momentum- and growth-driven strategies, while recognizing WOR as the more conservative, value-oriented allocation. Neither conclusion constitutes a definitive forecast, and each stock may serve different portfolio roles depending on an investor's timeframe and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PRLB vs. WOR commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRLB is a Hold and WOR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (PRLB: $75.05 vs. WOR: $56.21)
Brand notoriety: PRLB and WOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRLB: 127% vs. WOR: 74%
Market capitalization -- PRLB: $1.79B vs. WOR: $2.75B
PRLB [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $1.79B. WOR’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $2.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $5.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WOR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOR is a better buy in the long-term than PRLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRLB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WOR is a better buy in the short-term than PRLB.

Price Growth

PRLB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -4.08% price change this week, while WOR (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRLB is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

WOR is expected to report earnings on Sep 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-5.07% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WOR($2.75B) has a higher market cap than PRLB($1.79B). PRLB has higher P/E ratio than WOR: PRLB (70.80) vs WOR (17.90). PRLB YTD gains are higher at: 48.349 vs. WOR (9.790). WOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 265M vs. PRLB (66.2M). PRLB has more cash in the bank: 136M vs. WOR (27.7M). PRLB has less debt than WOR: PRLB (2.62M) vs WOR (350M). WOR has higher revenues than PRLB: WOR (1.38B) vs PRLB (546M).
PRLBWORPRLB / WOR
Capitalization1.79B2.75B65%
EBITDA66.2M265M25%
Gain YTD48.3499.790494%
P/E Ratio70.8017.90396%
Revenue546M1.38B40%
Total Cash136M27.7M491%
Total Debt2.62M350M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRLB vs WOR: Fundamental Ratings
PRLB
WOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6643
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
8755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WOR's Valuation (16) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRLB (84) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew significantly faster than PRLB’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRLB (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRLB’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's SMR Rating (55) in the Steel industry is in the same range as PRLB (87) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew similarly to PRLB’s over the last 12 months.

PRLB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as WOR (51) in the Steel industry. This means that PRLB’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.

PRLB's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WOR (100) in the Steel industry. This means that PRLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRLBWOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WOR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEM26.690.38
+1.43%
Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
PRFD50.55N/A
N/A
PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd
UTES77.57-0.02
-0.03%
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
CAFG33.50-0.02
-0.06%
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
TLTI43.50-0.28
-0.65%
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Yr Trsy Bd ETF

PRLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRLB has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRLB jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLB
1D Price
Change %
PRLB100%
-0.12%
CODI - PRLB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
NWPX - PRLB
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
CMC - PRLB
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
WOR - PRLB
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
ESAB - PRLB
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More