PSI
Price
$178.23
Change
+$10.75 (+6.42%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
2.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXQ
Price
$112.78
Change
+$6.65 (+6.27%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
3.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSI vs SOXQ

PSI vs SOXQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) vs. Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ)

Key Takeaways

  • PSI employs a smart beta strategy tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index with 31 holdings, emphasizing factors like price momentum and earnings quality, while SOXQ passively tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index with around 30 holdings using modified market-cap weighting.
  • SOXQ offers a lower expense ratio of 0.19% compared to PSI's 0.56%, providing better cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • Both ETFs deliver nearly 100% technology sector exposure focused on semiconductors, but PSI shows slightly higher concentration in top holdings (around 46%) versus SOXQ's 60%.
  • PSI has demonstrated stronger performance in recent months and year-to-date, driven by its factor-based selection, though both benefit from sector tailwinds with comparable 3-year annualized returns around 42%.
  • PSI exhibits higher volatility due to its active-like stock selection, suiting aggressive investors, while SOXQ provides more stable large-cap exposure.
  • In the AI-driven market, SOXQ's lower costs and mega-cap tilt position it for sustained momentum, but PSI's factor diversification may edge out in rotating conditions.

Introduction

Comparing PSI and SOXQ is timely amid the semiconductor sector's explosive growth, fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure demand and data center expansions. Both Invesco ETFs target U.S.-listed semiconductor companies, offering investors pure-play exposure to chip designers, manufacturers, and equipment providers. While they overlap significantly in holdings like NVDA and AVGO, PSI's smart beta approach contrasts with SOXQ's passive indexing, catering to different preferences for factor tilts versus broad market-cap representation. As capital flows into AI enablers, these funds represent alternative strategies for capturing sector upside amid geopolitical tensions and supply chain shifts.

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) Overview

The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) tracks the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex℠ Index, a smart beta benchmark selecting around 30 U.S. semiconductor stocks based on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value factors. It holds 31 securities, with the top 10 comprising about 46% of assets, including KLA Corp. (KLAC, 5.28%), Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD, 5.24%), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO, 5.22%), Lam Research Corp. (LRCX, 4.94%), and Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT, 4.84%). Sector allocation tilts heavily toward semiconductors (60%) and semiconductor materials & equipment (34%), with minor electronic equipment exposure. The expense ratio is 0.56%, and the fund rebalances quarterly. Launched in 2005, PSI's non-diversified structure suits investors seeking enhanced returns through factor-driven selection in the chip space.

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) Overview

The Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) passively replicates the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, a modified market-cap-weighted gauge of the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor firms involved in design, distribution, manufacturing, and sales. It maintains approximately 30-32 holdings, with top 10 weights totaling around 60%, led by NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA, ~12%), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO, ~10%), Micron Technology Inc. (MU, ~7%), Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL, ~5%), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD, ~4%). Fully allocated to technology, it emphasizes mega-cap leaders. The expense ratio stands at a low 0.19%, with quarterly rebalancing and annual reconstitution. Introduced in 2021, this non-diversified ETF provides cost-effective, liquid access to the sector's blue-chip names.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor sector thrives in 2026 amid an AI infrastructure supercycle, with global sales projected to hit $975 billion, up 26% year-over-year, driven by generative AI chips comprising nearly 50% of revenues. Catalysts include hyperscaler capital expenditures on data centers, high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand, and advanced packaging expansions. Capital flows heavily favor AI enablers like GPUs and accelerators, boosting top holdings in both ETFs. Regulatory tailwinds from the CHIPS Act support U.S. manufacturing resurgence, though geopolitical tensions—export controls on China—and supply constraints in advanced nodes pose risks. Macro drivers such as interest rate stability aid capex cycles, while sector volatility stems from concentrated growth reliance on a few mega-caps.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, PSI has outperformed SOXQ, with stronger gains over one-month (~20% vs. ~16%) and three-month periods (~24% vs. ~16%), and year-to-date (~40% vs. ~26%), attributed to its factor tilts capturing momentum in mid-tier names like KLAC and LRCX amid AI equipment demand surges. Over three years, annualized returns align closely (~42% for both), reflecting shared sector dynamics. PSI's higher volatility (~15% vs. SOXQ's ~13%) stems from concentrated smart beta picks, positioning it for outperformance in bullish rotations but added drawdown risk. SOXQ's mega-cap bias offers relative stability, tracking broader index flows tied to NVDA earnings and AI capex trends. Both benefit from memory price inflation and sector momentum, with relative strength linked to AI adoption rates.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SOXQ with moderate conviction (60-70% probability edge over 6-12 months). Its superior cost efficiency (0.19% expense ratio), broader large-cap diversification, and alignment with mega-cap AI leaders like NVDA position it for consistent trend capture amid sustained sector inflows. PSI's smart beta factors provide upside potential in momentum-driven cycles but trail on fees and exhibit elevated volatility, making SOXQ preferable for most risk-adjusted profiles in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PSI vs. SOXQ commentary
Jun 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSI is a StrongBuy and SOXQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXQ has more net assets: 3.22B vs. PSI (2.92B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than SOXQ: PSI (126.008) vs SOXQ (102.460). PSI was incepted earlier than SOXQ: PSI (21 years) vs SOXQ (5 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PSI (0.56). PSI has a higher turnover SOXQ (24.00) vs SOXQ (24.00).
PSISOXQPSI / SOXQ
Gain YTD126.008102.460123%
Net Assets2.92B3.22B91%
Total Expense Ratio0.560.19295%
Turnover78.0024.00325%
Yield0.050.2817%
Fund Existence21 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSISOXQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTSX59.200.65
+1.10%
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
CSB63.860.66
+1.04%
VictoryShares US SmCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF
IWDL60.00N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Fctr TR ETN
ZJUL29.85-0.01
-0.04%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF - 1Yr Jul
NEHI25.47-0.48
-1.85%
NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF

PSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSI
1D Price
Change %
PSI100%
+6.42%
LRCX - PSI
86%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
TER - PSI
84%
Closely correlated
+7.19%
SYNA - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+5.51%
AMAT - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
KLAC - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+8.73%
More

SOXQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXQ
1D Price
Change %
SOXQ100%
+6.27%
LRCX - SOXQ
85%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
AMAT - SOXQ
83%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
MPWR - SOXQ
82%
Closely correlated
+7.97%
KLAC - SOXQ
81%
Closely correlated
+8.73%
MKSI - SOXQ
80%
Closely correlated
+9.46%
More