Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PTF vs SMH
PTF vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts PTF vs SMH
PTF vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PTF vs. SMH commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTF is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.5B vs. PTF (693M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than PTF: SMH (58.212) vs PTF (41.920). PTF was incepted earlier than SMH: PTF (20 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than PTF (0.60). PTF has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| PTF | SMH | PTF / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 41.920 | 58.212 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 693M | 71.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.35 | 171% |
| Turnover | 217.00 | 12.00 | 1,808% |
| Yield | 0.01 | 0.20 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PTF | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 83% | 22 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTF has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PTF jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTF | 100% | -8.23% | ||
| LRCX - PTF | 84% Closely correlated | -4.63% | ||
| NXPI - PTF | 82% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MCHP - PTF | 81% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| TER - PTF | 81% Closely correlated | -8.77% | ||
| LSCC - PTF | 81% Closely correlated | -6.38% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -4.09% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -4.63% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -5.33% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -4.26% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -7.02% | ||
More | ||||