The Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) both target the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index universe, yet they pursue distinct strategies. QQQ offers straightforward passive replication, while PTNQ layers a systematic trend-following overlay that can allocate to Treasury bills during adverse signals. This comparison highlights structural differences relevant for investors evaluating growth-oriented exposure amid ongoing innovation cycles in technology and consumer sectors.
The Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) seeks to track the Pacer Nasdaq-100 Trendpilot Index. This rules-based index uses three indicators tied to the Nasdaq-100 Total Return Index's 200-business-day simple moving average to determine allocation: full equity exposure, a 50/50 split between equities and three-month U.S. Treasury bills, or full T-bill exposure. The ETF is passively managed with an expense ratio of 0.65%. When fully invested in equities, it holds approximately 100-103 positions, with top holdings typically including NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN), and Alphabet Inc (GOOGL/GOOG). Sector allocations mirror the Nasdaq-100, emphasizing technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary areas. The fund rebalances according to its trend signals rather than a fixed schedule.
The Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. It is structured as a unit investment trust and follows a passive management approach with quarterly rebalancing and annual reconstitution. The expense ratio stands at approximately 0.20%. The fund holds roughly 101-105 securities, featuring concentrated top positions such as NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD). Sector weights are dominated by technology, communication services, and consumer cyclical industries. QQQ maintains full equity exposure at all times, resulting in higher correlation to Nasdaq-100 performance dynamics.
Both ETFs operate within the large-cap growth segment, heavily weighted toward technology and innovation-driven companies. Key macro drivers include advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, semiconductors, and digital services, alongside broader economic factors such as interest rate paths and corporate earnings growth. Capital flows into growth equities have remained resilient in recent market cycles, supported by strong balance sheets among leading holdings. Sector risks encompass valuation compression in high-multiple names, regulatory scrutiny in technology, and potential shifts in monetary policy that could influence growth stock multiples.
In recent market cycles, QQQ has delivered direct participation in Nasdaq-100 rallies driven by earnings momentum in top holdings. PTNQ's trend-following rules have historically moderated drawdowns during prolonged equity declines by shifting toward T-bills, potentially resulting in lower volatility but also lagging during strong upward trends. Relative positioning favors QQQ for investors comfortable with full equity beta, while PTNQ provides a differentiated risk profile suited to environments with elevated uncertainty or sector rotation pressures.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic preference to Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) for its lower cost, consistent full equity exposure, and established liquidity profile within the Nasdaq-100 ecosystem. PTNQ’s trend-following overlay offers potential defensive benefits but introduces higher fees and variable equity participation that may reduce long-term compounding in sustained bull markets.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| PTNQ | QQQ | PTNQ / QQQ | |
| Gain YTD | 9.361 | 16.411 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 485B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.18 | 361% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 7.98 | 827% |
| Yield | 0.84 | 0.44 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| PTNQ | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GIDHX | 9.57 | 0.08 | +0.84% |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem Instl | |||
| MISIX | 22.62 | 0.18 | +0.80% |
| Victory Trivalent International Sm-Cp I | |||
| BPARX | 38.90 | 0.27 | +0.70% |
| Boston Partners All-Cap Value R6 | |||
| CIBCX | 85.05 | 0.43 | +0.51% |
| American Funds Capital Inc Bldr C | |||
| AREDX | 29.66 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| American Century Real Estate R6 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTNQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PTNQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTNQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTNQ | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| LRCX - PTNQ | 77% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| KLAC - PTNQ | 72% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ASML - PTNQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| AMD - PTNQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| AMAT - PTNQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQ | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| LRCX - QQQ | 77% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| AMAT - QQQ | 73% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| KLAC - QQQ | 72% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ASML - QQQ | 72% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| AMD - QQQ | 70% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||