PYPL
Price
$47.65
Change
+$1.33 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
42.03B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URI
Price
$1085.34
Change
-$10.21 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
67.99B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PYPL vs URI

PYPL vs URI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PYPL vs. URI commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYPL is a Buy and URI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (PYPL: $47.65 vs. URI: $1085.34)
Brand notoriety: PYPL and URI are both notable
PYPL represents the Savings Banks, while URI is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PYPL: 84% vs. URI: 52%
Market capitalization -- PYPL: $42.03B vs. URI: $67.99B
PYPL [@Savings Banks] is valued at $42.03B. URI’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $67.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $680.35B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $67.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $33.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PYPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileURI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • URI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, URI is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PYPL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while URI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PYPL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • URI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYPL is a better buy in the short-term than URI.

Price Growth

PYPL (@Savings Banks) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while URI (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

URI is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-3.70% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.03% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URI($68B) has a higher market cap than PYPL($42B). URI has higher P/E ratio than PYPL: URI (27.74) vs PYPL (8.94). URI YTD gains are higher at: 34.685 vs. PYPL (-17.863). PYPL (7.49B) and URI (7.21B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . PYPL has more cash in the bank: 9.34B vs. URI (156M). PYPL has less debt than URI: PYPL (9.41B) vs URI (15B). PYPL has higher revenues than URI: PYPL (33.7B) vs URI (16.4B).
PYPLURIPYPL / URI
Capitalization42B68B62%
EBITDA7.49B7.21B104%
Gain YTD-17.86334.685-51%
P/E Ratio8.9427.7432%
Revenue33.7B16.4B205%
Total Cash9.34B156M5,988%
Total Debt9.41B15B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PYPL vs URI: Fundamental Ratings
PYPL
URI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3728
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
3835
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5811
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9226
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYPL's Valuation (58) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for URI (92) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than URI’s over the last 12 months.

URI's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that URI’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

URI's SMR Rating (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (38) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that URI’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

URI's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (58) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that URI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

URI's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (92) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that URI’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PYPLURI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PYPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAL7.130.16
+2.30%
Proficient Auto Logistics Inc
EQBK48.850.95
+1.98%
Equity Bancshares
FITB57.180.11
+0.19%
Fifth Third Bancorp
GTIM1.44N/A
N/A
Good Times Restaurants
MRX64.88-0.91
-1.38%
Marex Group Limited

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with AER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then AER could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
+2.87%
AER - PYPL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
R - PYPL
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
URI - PYPL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
UPBD - PYPL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
OBDC - PYPL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More

URI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, URI has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if URI jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URI
1D Price
Change %
URI100%
-0.93%
SYF - URI
71%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
AXP - URI
71%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
OMF - URI
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
ENVA - URI
68%
Closely correlated
-2.55%
COF - URI
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
More