Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAHX
QCLGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAHX
QCLGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. QCLGX (5.61B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAHX (0.41) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: QCLGX (21 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAHX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.46 vs. RGAHX (1.64). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.85 vs. QCLGX (9.33).
| QCLGX | RGAHX | QCLGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.44 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.44 | 423% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.026 | 5.692 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 1.64 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.86 | 36.31 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.33 | 13.85 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.76 | 99.57 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement