QH
Price
$5.11
Change
+$0.14 (+2.82%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOUN
Price
$7.41
Change
-$0.05 (-0.67%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QH vs SOUN

QH vs SOUN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QH vs. SOUN commentary
Aug 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QH is a Hold and SOUN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2026
Stock price -- (QH: $5.11 vs. SOUN: $7.41)
Brand notoriety: QH and SOUN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QH: 289% vs. SOUN: 58%
Market capitalization -- QH: $13.89M vs. SOUN: $3.29B
QH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $13.89M. SOUN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $239.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOUN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOUN is a better buy in the long-term than QH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOUN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SOUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QH is a better buy in the short-term than SOUN.

Price Growth

QH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +18.84% price change this week, while SOUN (@Packaged Software) price change was +13.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOUN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.31% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOUN($3.29B) has a higher market cap than QH($13.9M). SOUN YTD gains are higher at: -25.176 vs. QH (-99.986). SOUN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -124.31M vs. QH (-162.41M). QH has higher revenues than SOUN: QH (2.53B) vs SOUN (184M).
QHSOUNQH / SOUN
Capitalization13.9M3.29B0%
EBITDA-162.41M-124.31M131%
Gain YTD-99.986-25.176397%
P/E Ratio0.00N/A-
Revenue2.53B184M1,373%
Total CashN/A216M-
Total DebtN/A6.23M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QH: Fundamental Ratings
QH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QHSOUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEON0.28N/A
+0.11%
AEON Biopharma
VIRT55.67-0.18
-0.32%
Virtu Financial Inc
FNWD44.22-0.29
-0.65%
Finward Bancorp
NNE18.57-0.28
-1.49%
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc
ALAB317.23-16.94
-5.07%
Astera Labs

QH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QH and RMSG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QH and RMSG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QH
1D Price
Change %
QH100%
+13.45%
RMSG - QH
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
SOUN - QH
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.98%
TEAM - QH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
CDNS - QH
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
RMNI - QH
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
More

SOUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOUN has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOUN jumps, then AI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOUN
1D Price
Change %
SOUN100%
-6.98%
AI - SOUN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
BULL - SOUN
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
CRNC - SOUN
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
PLTR - SOUN
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
MSTR - SOUN
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
More