Advertisement
QH vs TEAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QH is a Hold and TEAM is a Hold.
QH | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QH's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that QH’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
QH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that QH’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QH (96) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to QH’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QH (65) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to QH’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QH (100) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than QH’s over the last 12 months.
| QH | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
QH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.19% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
QH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QH and RMSG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QH and RMSG's prices will move in lockstep.
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| NOW - TEAM | 73% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
More | ||||