Advertisement
CDNS vs QH
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a StrongBuy and QH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.01% price change this week, while QH (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-3.96% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CDNS | QH | CDNS / QH | |
| Capitalization | 80.6B | 10.8M | 746,296% |
| EBITDA | 2.28B | -162.41M | -1,402% |
| Gain YTD | -6.360 | -99.988 | 6% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.19 | 0.00 | 4,777,574% |
| Revenue | 5.84B | 2.53B | 231% |
| Total Cash | 1.44B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.65B | N/A | - |
CDNS | QH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QH's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (83) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QH (100) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QH’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's SMR Rating (41) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QH (98) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QH’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QH (95) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to QH’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QH (100) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to QH’s over the last 12 months.
| CDNS | QH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 25 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement