CDNS
Price
$322.74
Change
-$6.73 (-2.04%)
Updated
Oct 15, 12:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
89.97B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QH
Price
$3.43
Change
-$0.12 (-3.38%)
Updated
Oct 15, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs QH

CDNS vs QH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. QH commentary
Oct 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and QH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CDNS with price predictions
Oct 14, 2026

CDNS sees its 50-day moving average cross bearishly below its 200-day moving average

The 50-day moving average for CDNS moved below the 200-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for CDNS moved out of overbought territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 28 of the 42 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 67%.

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 47 of 67 cases where CDNS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CDNS as a result. In 69 of 98 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CDNS turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 71%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CDNS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.

CDNS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 24, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

CDNS moved above its 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for CDNS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 14 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

Following a +2.33% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CDNS advanced for three days, in 222 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 123 of 199 cases where CDNS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 62%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CDNS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 84 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (13.123) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (64.950) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.496) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (13.141) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for QH with price predictions
Oct 14, 2026

Momentum Indicator for QH turns negative, indicating new downward trend

QH saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on September 28, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 101 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 93 of the 101 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.

The Aroon Indicator for QH entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QH's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 30 of 35 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 69 of 75 cases where QH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QH just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where QH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +7.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QH advanced for three days, in 173 of 210 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

QH may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 21 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.202) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. QH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs QH: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
QH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4595
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
4396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QH's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QH (100) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QH’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (43) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QH (96) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QH’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QH (64) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to QH’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QH (100) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to QH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSQH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CDNS: $329.46 vs. QH: $3.55)
Brand notoriety: CDNS and QH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 124% vs. QH: 48%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $89.97B vs. QH: $10.67M
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $89.97B. QH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $10.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $39 to $244.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while QH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than QH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • QH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QH is a better buy in the short-term than CDNS.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.49% price change this week, while QH (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.82% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXFY2.450.01
+0.41%
Expensify
CATY59.05-0.29
-0.49%
Cathay General Bancorp
REPX46.43-1.32
-2.76%
Riley Exploration Permian
ZS220.79-7.87
-3.44%
Zscaler
ICU3.01-0.58
-16.16%
SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation

QH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QH and RMSG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QH and RMSG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QH
1D Price
Change %
QH100%
+1.43%
RMSG - QH
26%
Poorly correlated
+6.04%
CDNS - QH
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
SSTI - QH
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
SOUN - QH
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.17%
TEAM - QH
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More