| QLV | RECS | QLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.013 | 8.178 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 162M | 5.93B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.15 | 53% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 32.00 | 144% |
| Yield | 1.57 | 0.75 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLV and ATR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLV and ATR's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||