Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLV vs. RECS commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLV is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.7B vs. QLV (156M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QLV: RECS (4.946) vs QLV (4.135). QLV was incepted earlier than RECS: QLV (7 years) vs RECS (7 years). QLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). QLV has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| QLV | RECS | QLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.135 | 4.946 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 156M | 5.7B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.15 | 53% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 32.00 | 144% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 0.74 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SRV | 48.47 | 0.20 | +0.41% |
| NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund | |||
| JULT | 47.64 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF | |||
| OCTU | 30.04 | -0.30 | -1.00% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncOctETF | |||
| BBYY | 9.94 | -0.11 | -1.08% |
| Graniteshares YieldBOOST Baba ETF | |||
| JPEF | 78.60 | -1.24 | -1.55% |
| JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF | |||
QLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLV and ATR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLV and ATR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLV | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| ATR - QLV | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMZN - QLV | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| AMGN - QLV | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| PSA - QLV | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| ALKS - QLV | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.43% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||