Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLV vs. RECS commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLV is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.76B vs. QLV (162M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QLV: RECS (7.419) vs QLV (6.023). QLV was incepted earlier than RECS: QLV (7 years) vs RECS (7 years). QLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). QLV has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| QLV | RECS | QLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.023 | 7.419 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 162M | 5.76B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.15 | 53% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 32.00 | 144% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 0.74 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLAX | 38.74 | 0.34 | +0.88% |
| Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | |||
| NUGY | 15.30 | 0.08 | +0.56% |
| Graniteshares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF | |||
| JPEF | 81.01 | 0.25 | +0.32% |
| JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF | |||
| BUFG | 29.37 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF | |||
| OCTM | 33.56 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF – Oct | |||
QLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLV and ATR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLV and ATR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.17% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||