QS
Price
$12.14
Change
+$0.06 (+0.50%)
Updated
Nov 28, 10:44 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.26B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VC
Price
$103.42
Change
+$0.32 (+0.31%)
Updated
Nov 28, 10:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.81B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QS vs VC

Header iconQS vs VC Comparison
Open Charts QS vs VCBanner chart's image
QuantumScape
Price$12.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
Volume$11.15K
Capitalization7.26B
Visteon
Price$103.42
Change+$0.32 (+0.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.81B
QS vs VC Comparison Chart in %
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QS vs. VC commentary
Nov 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QS is a StrongBuy and VC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 28, 2025
Stock price -- (QS: $12.08 vs. VC: $103.10)
Brand notoriety: QS and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QS: 31% vs. VC: 66%
Market capitalization -- QS: $7.26B vs. VC: $2.81B
QS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $7.26B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $85.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.05% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

VC is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.68% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($7.26B) has a higher market cap than VC($2.81B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 132.755 vs. VC (16.793). VC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 475M vs. QS (-369.67M). QS has less debt than VC: QS (73M) vs VC (442M). VC has higher revenues than QS: VC (3.76B) vs QS (0).
QSVCQS / VC
Capitalization7.26B2.81B258%
EBITDA-369.67M475M-78%
Gain YTD132.75516.793791%
P/E RatioN/A9.25-
Revenue03.76B-
Total Cash1BN/A-
Total Debt73M442M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VC: Fundamental Ratings
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEMVX14.530.21
+1.47%
Causeway Emerging Markets Investor
ANAVX25.140.30
+1.21%
Virtus NFJ International Value R6
CSUZX25.720.29
+1.14%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
IRCIX13.250.10
+0.76%
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port S2
JMGRX151.610.89
+0.59%
Janus Henderson Enterprise I

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+1.85%
SLDP - QS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
MBLY - QS
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.17%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More

VC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VC has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VC jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VC
1D Price
Change %
VC100%
+0.18%
LEA - VC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
BWA - VC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
ALV - VC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
MGA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
APTV - VC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
More