QS
Price
$8.79
Change
-$0.49 (-5.28%)
Updated
Jul 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
84 days until earnings call
VC
Price
$111.71
Change
-$2.00 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jul 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.23B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QS vs VC

Header iconQS vs VC Comparison
Open Charts QS vs VCBanner chart's image
QuantumScape
Price$8.79
Change-$0.49 (-5.28%)
Volume$469.36K
Capitalization3.04B
Visteon
Price$111.71
Change-$2.00 (-1.76%)
Volume$7.78K
Capitalization3.23B
QS vs VC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QS vs. VC commentary
Jul 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QS is a Hold and VC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2025
Stock price -- (QS: $9.28 vs. VC: $113.71)
Brand notoriety: QS and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QS: 149% vs. VC: 109%
Market capitalization -- QS: $3.04B vs. VC: $3.23B
QS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.04B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than VC.

Price Growth

QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -32.75% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

VC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.83% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VC($3.23B) has a higher market cap than QS($3.04B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 78.805 vs. VC (28.167). VC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 378M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. VC (515M). QS has less debt than VC: QS (101M) vs VC (445M). VC has higher revenues than QS: VC (3.95B) vs QS (0).
QSVCQS / VC
Capitalization3.04B3.23B94%
EBITDA-392.95M378M-104%
Gain YTD78.80528.167280%
P/E RatioN/A6.87-
Revenue03.95B-
Total Cash1.07B515M208%
Total Debt101M445M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VC: Fundamental Ratings
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRLIX8.51N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - I
EVTMX16.93N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder A
SIBAX37.45N/A
N/A
Sit Balanced
UIAGX76.61N/A
N/A
Victory Aggressive Growth Institutional
MGRDX47.86N/A
N/A
MFS International Growth R6

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-15.48%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-7.14%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-16.05%
LIMAF - QS
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
MBLY - QS
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.53%
More