QSR
Price
$73.60
Change
-$0.76 (-1.02%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$141.81
Change
+$1.71 (+1.22%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions QSR vs YUM

Header iconQSR vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts QSR vs YUMBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International
Price$73.60
Change-$0.76 (-1.02%)
Volume$286.78K
CapitalizationN/A
Yum! Brands
Price$141.81
Change+$1.71 (+1.22%)
Volume$420.56K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
QSR vs YUM Comparison Chart

Loading...

QSRDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
YUMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
QSR vs. YUM commentary
Apr 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSR is a StrongBuy and YUM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2024
Stock price -- (QSR: $74.35 vs. YUM: $140.10)
Brand notoriety: QSR: Not notable vs. YUM: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSR: 80% vs. YUM: 107%
Market capitalization -- QSR: $23.07B vs. YUM: $39.92B
QSR [@Restaurants] is valued at $23.07B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $39.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $199.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than QSR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the short-term than YUM.

Price Growth

QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.64% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for QSR with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for YUM with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($39.9B) has a higher market cap than QSR($23.1B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than QSR: YUM (25.37) vs QSR (19.58). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 9.077 vs. QSR (-5.092).
QSRYUMQSR / YUM
Capitalization23.1B39.9B58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.0929.077-56%
P/E Ratio19.5825.3777%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSR vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
QSR
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5419
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5534
SMR RATING
1..100
2210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5629
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6574
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (29). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (55). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (22). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (56). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (74). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSRYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QSRDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
YUMDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAKE16.890.58
+3.56%
Lakeland Industries
OXBR1.100.03
+2.69%
Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited
CARG23.34-0.13
-0.55%
CarGurus
JNPR35.36-0.52
-1.45%
Juniper Networks
SVM3.47-0.07
-1.98%
Silvercorp Metals

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
-0.98%
MCD - QSR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
YUM - QSR
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
FRSH - QSR
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
DRI - QSR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
EAT - QSR
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+1.22%
MCD - YUM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
SBUX - YUM
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
QSR - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
WEN - YUM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More