QTUM
Price
$165.79
Change
-$1.97 (-1.17%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:19 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$122.64
Change
-$1.27 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:23 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
146.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM vs VGT

Header iconQTUM vs VGT Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs VGTBanner chart's image
QTUM vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • QTUM offers targeted thematic exposure to quantum computing and machine learning via a modified equal-weighted index, while VGT provides broad, market-cap-weighted U.S. information technology sector coverage.
  • QTUM holds approximately 86 stocks with top holdings under 3% each for balanced diversification; VGT has 317 holdings but top 10 comprise ~59%, driven by mega-caps like NVDA and AAPL.
  • Expense ratio: QTUM at 0.40% vs. VGT's low 0.09%, favoring VGT for cost efficiency over long horizons.
  • QTUM's global, niche focus introduces higher volatility and emerging tech risks; VGT's established U.S. tech dominance offers liquidity and relative stability.
  • Both heavily tilted to technology (QTUM ~82%, VGT 100%), with shared exposure to semiconductors like MU and AMD.
  • VGT benefits from superior liquidity (avg daily volume >4M shares) and scale ($121B+ AUM), enhancing tradability.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving technology landscape, investors seek efficient ways to capture growth from AI, semiconductors, and next-generation computing. QTUM and VGT represent contrasting strategies within this space: QTUM delivers specialized exposure to quantum computing and machine learning innovators, while VGT tracks the broad U.S. information technology sector. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternatives for thematic purity versus comprehensive sector participation. Amid surging capital flows into tech—driven by AI infrastructure demand and semiconductor cycles—this comparison highlights structural trade-offs in diversification, costs, and positioning for investors balancing innovation bets with established growth.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a passive, thematic ETF that tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index (BQTUM). This modified equal-weighted index targets global companies deriving significant revenue from quantum computing, machine learning, or related technologies like superconducting materials and AI chips.

QTUM holds approximately 86 stocks, promoting diversification with no single holding exceeding 3%. Top holdings include INTC (2.96%), MU (2.82%), Global Unichip Corp. (2.45%), MediaTek Inc. (2.36%), and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) (2.13%). Sector allocations emphasize technology (~82%), industrials (~10%), and communication services (~6%).

Its expense ratio is 0.40%, reflecting active index curation. As a non-diversified fund, QTUM rebalances periodically to maintain thematic purity, with strong liquidity via a 0.11% median 30-day spread and AUM over $4.7 billion.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is a passive index ETF tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, which includes large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. companies in the GICS information technology sector—spanning software, hardware, semiconductors, and IT services.

VGT features 317 holdings in a market-cap-weighted structure. Top 10 account for ~59%: NVDA (18.53%), AAPL (15.85%), MSFT (10.21%), AVGO (4.38%), and MU (2.02%). Sector breakdown is 100% technology, with semiconductors (34%), technology hardware (19%), and systems software (15%) prominent.

Expense ratio stands at a low 0.09%. The fund employs full replication or sampling, with low turnover (~8%) and exceptional liquidity (avg daily volume >4 million shares, 0.03% median spread). AUM exceeds $121 billion.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector remains a capital magnet, with ETF inflows exceeding $12 billion monthly amid AI infrastructure buildout and semiconductor demand. Catalysts include robust earnings from chipmakers, cloud expansion, and policy support for domestic manufacturing via the CHIPS Act (Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors). Macro drivers like moderating interest rates favor growth stocks, while risks encompass valuation stretches, geopolitical tensions over supply chains, and potential sector rotation toward value areas. Quantum computing emerges as a long-term disruptor, blending with AI trends, though commercialization lags behind mature IT subsectors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, both ETFs have participated in tech's rebound, with VGT delivering steady gains from mega-cap leaders like NVDA and MSFT amid AI earnings cycles. QTUM has shown higher volatility, outperforming in quantum/AI hype phases due to equal weighting but trailing in broad rallies dominated by U.S. giants. Year-to-date through early 2026, QTUM's ~32% return edged VGT's ~19%, tied to semiconductor momentum in holdings like MU and AMD. VGT's concentration amplifies upside from sector rotation into growth, while QTUM's global diversification tempers U.S.-centric risks. Volatility profiles reflect VGT's lower beta (~1.29) versus QTUM's (~1.50), suiting different risk appetites amid interest rate and geopolitical shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VGT over QTUM, with ~65% probability of superior risk-adjusted returns in prevailing conditions. VGT's ultra-low costs, massive liquidity, broad U.S. tech exposure, and alignment with sustained AI/semiconductor momentum outweigh QTUM's thematic appeal. While QTUM suits high-conviction quantum plays, VGT's scale and diversification position it better amid ongoing sector tailwinds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTUM vs. VGT commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and VGT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 147B vs. QTUM (6.02B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT: QTUM (53.292) vs VGT (31.508). QTUM was incepted earlier than VGT: QTUM (8 years) vs VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
QTUMVGTQTUM / VGT
Gain YTD53.29231.508169%
Net Assets6.02B147B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.09444%
Turnover42.008.00525%
Yield0.730.32232%
Fund Existence8 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCAL21.860.05
+0.23%
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
SUPL47.05N/A
N/A
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
WTBN25.16-0.06
-0.24%
WisdomTree Bianco Fixed Inc Ttl Ret ETF
BBIN78.29-0.51
-0.65%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Intl Eq ETF
CXSE40.46-0.43
-1.05%
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owd Entpr ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-0.59%
LRCX - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
+2.78%
MKSI - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
ONTO - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
AMAT - QTUM
71%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
TSM - QTUM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
More

VGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGT
1D Price
Change %
VGT100%
-1.48%
NVDA - VGT
75%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
AVGO - VGT
69%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
LRCX - VGT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.78%
KLAC - VGT
67%
Closely correlated
+3.91%
CEVA - VGT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
More