Advertisement
QUBT vs SCKT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUBT is a Hold and SCKT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QUBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCKT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCKT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QUBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCKT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QUBT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SCKT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
SCKT is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
| QUBT | SCKT | QUBT / SCKT | |
| Capitalization | 2.58B | 7.5M | 34,392% |
| EBITDA | -38.8M | -1.2M | 3,240% |
| Gain YTD | -2.538 | -28.850 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 385K | 17.8M | 2% |
| Total Cash | 166M | 1.71M | 9,725% |
| Total Debt | 1.06M | 6.66M | 16% |
QUBT | SCKT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCKT's Valuation (88) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as QUBT (94) in the null industry. This means that SCKT’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCKT (100) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCKT’s over the last 12 months.
SCKT's SMR Rating (95) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as QUBT (97) in the null industry. This means that SCKT’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SCKT (65) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to SCKT’s over the last 12 months.
SCKT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Computer Peripherals industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUBT (100) in the null industry. This means that SCKT’s stock grew significantly faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
| QUBT | SCKT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
QUBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBT | 100% | +2.35% | ||
| QBTS - QUBT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| RGTI - QUBT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| IONQ - QUBT | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| QMCO - QUBT | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| UMAC - QUBT | 37% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
More | ||||
SCKT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCKT and DDD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCKT and DDD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCKT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCKT | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| DDD - SCKT | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| QUBT - SCKT | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
| EBON - SCKT | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
| INVE - SCKT | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| SSYS - SCKT | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.56% | ||
More | ||||