QUBT vs TBIIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUBT is a StrongBuy and TBIIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QUBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBIIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TBIIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QUBT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- QUBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QUBT (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +31.86% price change this week, while TBIIF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +5.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+0.49% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| QUBT | TBIIF | QUBT / TBIIF | |
| Capitalization | 75.1M | 198M | 38% |
| EBITDA | -35.07M | -111M | 32% |
| Gain YTD | -4.720 | -61.792 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 284K | 792M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 7.38M | 360M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 5.67M | 85M | 7% |
QUBT | TBIIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TBIIF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBT (68). This means that TBIIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
TBIIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBT (100). This means that TBIIF’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
TBIIF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBT (96). This means that TBIIF’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBIIF (84). This means that QUBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TBIIF (100). This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
| QUBT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
QUBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBT | 100% | +14.47% | ||
| RGTI - QUBT | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| QBTS - QUBT | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IONQ - QUBT | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| ANET - QUBT | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| DDD - QUBT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||
TBIIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TBIIF and RCAT have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBIIF and RCAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBIIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBIIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RCAT - TBIIF | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.00% | ||
| SEKEY - TBIIF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| QUBT - TBIIF | 6% Poorly correlated | +14.47% | ||
| TSHTY - TBIIF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LNVGY - TBIIF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||