It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QUBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWACMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QUBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WACMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
QUBT | WACMF | QUBT / WACMF | |
Capitalization | 2.58B | 635M | 406% |
EBITDA | -38.8M | 7.96B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -2.538 | -6.148 | 41% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.30 | - |
Revenue | 385K | 121B | 0% |
Total Cash | 166M | 27.2B | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.06M | 14B | 0% |
QUBT | WACMF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WACMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUBT (94). This means that WACMF’s stock grew significantly faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WACMF (100). This means that QUBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WACMF’s over the last 12 months.
WACMF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBT (97). This means that WACMF’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WACMF (49). This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to WACMF’s over the last 12 months.
WACMF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBT (100). This means that WACMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.
QUBT | WACMF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago30% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 3 days ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago26% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago20% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago90% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GGRUX | 14.93 | 0.11 | +0.74% |
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R6 | |||
MDBAX | 19.23 | 0.13 | +0.68% |
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Inv A | |||
AUICX | 34.40 | 0.22 | +0.64% |
AB Equity Income C | |||
FIONX | 16.65 | 0.08 | +0.48% |
Fidelity SAI International Index | |||
FNDMX | 13.46 | 0.03 | +0.22% |
Fidelity Series Sust Non-US Dev Mrkt Fd |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT | 100% | +2.35% | ||
QBTS - QUBT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
RGTI - QUBT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
IONQ - QUBT | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
QMCO - QUBT | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
UMAC - QUBT | 37% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WACMF and SEKEY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WACMF and SEKEY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WACMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WACMF | 100% | N/A | ||
SEKEY - WACMF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
TBIIF - WACMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
TSHTY - WACMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VRTK - WACMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QUBT - WACMF | -3% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
More |